Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Albanian Revolt of 1911

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 17:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Albanian Revolt of 1911

[edit]

Created/expanded by Antidiskriminator (talk). Self nom at 21:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Hook verified in source, interesting, and formatted. Article is new and long enough. The problem I have is that there are a few paragraphs which are uncited in the article: the Revolt in Malësia and the last sentence in Activities of the Great Powers. --Odie5533 (talk) 01:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Looks great, changed to pass. I noticed a lot of the references are duplicates, like many pages from Treadway 1983 and Gawrych 2006. For future improvements, and other articles as well, you should combine refs whenever possible. For an example, take a look at the references of Indian Camp. --Odie5533 (talk) 00:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice. I plan to change ref style of this article to CITESHORT and to nominate it for GA after further expansion. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 Doing... I now know how to use CITESHORT style of referencing. Please hold on with moving this hook to prep area for a couple of day, untill I change referencing style.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
  •  Done I used citeshort with harv referencing style with all sources repeatedly used in the article. That way I avoided duplicate references and this hook can be moved to prep area.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
It's much easier to read now! I noticed you added some context quotes to make it easy to verify the information. These usually aren't necessary, and I don't usually see them in articles. Just thought I'd mention that. --Odie5533 (talk) 19:56, 16 October 2011 (UTC)