Template:Did you know nominations/Branimir Inscription
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 07:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Branimir Inscription[edit]
- ... that the 9th-century Branimir Inscription (pictured) is the oldest surviving example of ethnonym of the Croats?
- Reviewed: Walt Smallwood
Created/expanded by Tomobe03 (talk). Self nom at 21:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
 OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
 OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
The sources in Croatian are accepted in good faith. However, the English-language source doesn't match the information in the article, as the source says there are five inscriptions about Branimir, but the article seems to say there are three inscriptions (the subject of the article, the Nin inscription, and the Muć Gornji inscription). Except for this one issue, this is a solid article and DYK nom by Tomobe03. OCNative (talk) 08:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're right... I was thinking that the two in Nin and Muć need be pointed out and inadvertently typed the word "two" in place of single number needed there i.e. four. Thanks for correcting.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:14, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Ok, good to go, with Croatian language sources accepted in good faith. Thanks for the quick response! (By the way, I did make a minor grammatical correction in the article and updated the Google Books link for the English language source, so that it goes to the exact page in question, rather than the cover of the book). OCNative (talk) 00:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)