Template:Did you know nominations/Caleb Grimshaw
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 14:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Caleb Grimshaw
- ... that the Caleb Grimshaw sank after catching on fire, with the loss of at least 90 of the 457 people on board? Source: https://www.newyorkalmanack.com/2023/01/migrants-at-sea-deadly-voyages-to-new-york/, https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/~cmi/books/emigrant/calebG.html
- Reviewed:
- Comment: 5th DYK nomination, my QPQ is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1893-S_Morgan_dollar
Created by Annwfwn (talk). Self-nominated at 21:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Caleb Grimshaw; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Article is new enough and long enough. What makes this a reliable source, or the people quoted therein? I don't see 1848 there, nor the posthumous naming. Wonder if we should include Hoxie's cowardice somehow. Source text sometimes pretty similar to article text, but I don't think it crosses into plagiarism or copyvio. AGFing on some offline sources. Where does the information in the infobox come from? About the hook, I think it should be "sank" and "at least 90". QPQ is OK. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: What makes this a reliable source, or the people quoted therein? Thank you, the link was incorrect and I fixed it. I waffled on this one since since it's a family geneology website but everything was sourced and it had links which led me to many of my other sources. I did try to double source everything from this website. This is the correct link.
- OK, but I don't see what makes that website a reliable source. Is there an About Us page somewhere? Who is the author of the website? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wonder if we should include Hoxie's cowardice somehow. I agree, I can work on that.
- Where does the information in the infobox come from? Everything in the infobox is also in the text sourced. Should I source the infobox too?
- About the hook, I think it should be "sank" and "at least 90". I like that better, fixed. Annwfwn (talk) 12:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, the infobox text isn't present in the article text? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: my vision isn't great. What specific info isn't in the text but is in the infobox? I did doublecheck, MOS:INFOBOXCITE says it doesn't have to be sourced as long as the relevant text has a citation. Thanks! Annwfwn (talk)
- The tonnage, draught and length data. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: 2nd sentence under construction. I did go ahead and modify them to say actual units of measurements vs the ' often used in feet.
- The tonnage, draught and length data. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: What makes this a reliable source, or the people quoted therein? Thank you, the link was incorrect and I fixed it. I waffled on this one since since it's a family geneology website but everything was sourced and it had links which led me to many of my other sources. I did try to double source everything from this website. This is the correct link.
per the source reliability thing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)