Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Carl Berner (supercentenarian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 13:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Carl Berner (supercentenarian)

[edit]
  • ... that civic activist and former toymaker Carl Berner is the oldest living man in New York City?

Created/expanded by Futurist110 (talk). Self nom at 01:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

  • A quid pro quo (QPQ) review needs to be completed by the nominator in order for this nomination to be reviewed. Please supply a link to that review when it is completed. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
  • No QPQ review provided for a week after nominator was notified of requirement. Nominator's edit history shows they have been active on Wikipedia during this week. --Allen3 talk 14:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Note: nominator was not formally notified on talk page until earlier today, through my error. Please hold off for 72 hours before closing this nomination to allow time for response. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
I've reviewed a DYK? article here: Template:Did you know nominations/Matthew Brisbane and I added sources for 2004 and 2008 now as well. I think this article is good to go right now. I'm very sorry for the delay. Futurist110 (talk) 03:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
I've reviewed another two DYK? nominations right now.
I hope that someone can review this DYK? nomination of mine now, since I already did 3 DYK? nomination reviews myself. Futurist110 (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Needs new review now that QPQ has been satisfied. (QPQ article reviewed, the Pac-Man one, now listed in header.)

— Seems good to go:

  • Fits required # of characters.
  • No BLP concerns.
  • Nominated on day of creation.
  • I've fixed some grammar issues.
  • I've formatted the dates and refs.
  • All information appears to be properly referenced.
  • QPQ taken care of.

--Activism1234 00:09, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Yeah I fixed some minor stuff right now and I also think it's good to go, unless someone else objects to anything. Futurist110 (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2012 (UTC)