Template:Did you know nominations/Frieda Nadig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Frieda Nadig

  • Reviewed: Judith Liberman
  • Comment: I was amazed we didn't have an article on this important woman, central in the early postwar German struggle for women't rights. There are pictures related to the tunnel, but I don't think there is a free image of the person. Better hooks always welcome.

Moved to mainspace by Kusma (talk). Self-nominated at 18:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Very interesting article. I like ALT1 best, followed by ALT2 epicgenius (talk) 17:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

  • Epicgenius, thank you for the review! I fixed the references as you suggested -- it's only my second article using {{sfn}}, so I haven't quite figured out how it works. —Kusma (t·c) 17:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Epicgenius, thank you, that's a very useful script, just used it to fix errors in my other Harvard referenced article that I hadn't been aware of. BTW do you know why the bot hasn't moved this nom to /Approved or is this a question for @Wugapodes:? —Kusma (t·c) 10:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Kusma, I think the bot has been down for a few days now, so maybe it should be moved to /Approved manually. epicgenius (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

The bot that has been down is a different bot. WugBot seems to be active. —Kusma (t·c) 14:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Oops, I didn't realize. Maybe WugBot didn't catch the check mark. Here it is. epicgenius (talk) 17:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this to a special slot in our March 8 International Women's Day set. I'm wondering if we could combine facts from the different hooks to make a more suitable hook for this day. Like:
  • ALT3: ... that Frieda Nadig, one of the four "mothers of the Basic Law" of the Federal Republic of Germany, proposed to include the sentence "men and women have equal rights" in the 1948 law but was voted down? Yoninah (talk) 16:22, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Yoninah, this is probably ok, but there's one minor issue with it. "1948 law" sounds like it was any old law. It was, in fact, the constitution of West Germany, which just happens to be called "Basic Law" because they wanted to wait until reunification before thinking about something as permanent as a constitution. It also was finished only in 1949, and "1949 constitution" is a better way to describe it. That the sentence was included in the end is probably part of the hookiness of the story, so I'll defer to you about not using "initially" as in ALT0. I'm super happy about a Women's Day slot for her, by the way. Here's another version. —Kusma (t·c) 17:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  • ALT4 ... that when Frieda Nadig, one of the four "mothers of the Basic Law", the constitution of West Germany, proposed to include the sentence "men and women have equal rights" in the constitution in 1948 but was voted down?
  • @Kusma: Thank you. I was looking for another word there and "constitution" fits the bill. But your alt is really too long. Can we go with:
  • ALT3a: ... that Frieda Nadig, one of the four "mothers of the Basic Law" in the Federal Republic of Germany, proposed to include the sentence "men and women have equal rights" in the 1949 constitution but was voted down? Yoninah (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Restoring tick for ALT3a per Epicgenius' review. Yoninah (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)