Template:Did you know nominations/Glutonny

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Glutonny

(
)
Glutonny in 2020
Glutonny in 2020
Source: Banusing, Justin (30 July 2019). "Spring 2019 #PGRU: 20-11". www.redbull.com. Retrieved 20 June 2020. & Hepworth, Stuart (23 January 2020). "Fall 2019 #PGRU: 10-1". www.redbull.com. Retrieved 20 June 2020.

Created by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk). Self-nominated at 03:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

cc User:The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Mdaniels5757. Thank you for the review.
- The "he was considered" section is cited in the first line of the section "Wario". I've been told before that, per MOS:CITELEAD, I should not use citations in the lead for things that are cited in the body.
- I've changed ALT1 to use your wording and struck ALT1A
- There is no CC0 option in Flickr, only PD-mark. PD-mark is an indication that the Flickr user believes that the file is in the public domain. There is a clear consensus that when the creator of a work releases it under PD-mark on Flickr, it is equivalent to PD-author, though the exact wording for the new template is being worked on still.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
@The Squirrel Conspiracy: Hi. I don't think that the "he was considered [the best]" bit needs to be cited there, but it should say who considered him the best. There actually is a CC0 option on Flickr: "Public Domain Dedication (CC0)". I didn't realize that PDM proposal moved to a Commons RfC already, I ought to respond. I don't think it's that big of a deal, but it'd be prudent to try to get an explicit release under a real legal instrument. Cheers, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Mdaniels5757: I've added "According to the Panda Global Rankings and to writers covering competitive Smash", though I think that's unnecessary.
If you have OTRS access, there's a ticket in the file description that shows you that the author's intent is clear. I take a dim view towards going back to the rightsholder over and over again, well past the point where there is any actual ambiguity of intent, in order to satisfy Wikipedia or Commons' insatiable bureaucracy. If you choose not to approve the photo I'll be disappointed, but I'm not going to bother the donor again. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I do have OTRS access, and read the ticket. Getting a CC0 release isn't required, but would have been nice. It's good as-is tho. Main hook is approved and preferred, ALT1 is also approved. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Glutonny&oldid=1026002218"