The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm happy with this. Date and length are fine, sources are good, referencing is comprehensive. Article is well-written, though it would have been nice to have had a picture (any chance?). The hook fact is sourced. I'd say this is good to go. Prioryman (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)