Template talk:Bluegrass music

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template Created[edit]

Thanks to everyone contributing who's helped the template. If you'd like to help further, feel free to edit the template itself or add it to related articles.—oac old american century talk @ 06:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Possible Bluegrass Wikiproject[edit]

Hi! This is very useful template. There are a number of red links, though. I'm trying to drum up interest in creating a Wikiproject or task force to improve the hundreds of bluegrass articles on Wikipedia. Anyone interested please leave me a message at: User talk:Anne Delong/Bluegrass Topics Those red links in the template would make good task for such a group. I've started gathering some material at: User:Anne Delong/Bluegrass Topics. In the mean time, I'll be adding this template to pages that I come across. Thanks for creating it.—Anne Delong (talk) 23:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Too many redlinks[edit]

As far as I know, a template like this (that isn't exhaustive, as say an NBA team's roster) usually shouldn't have redlinks. Especially so in a category called "notable festivals" (notability having a specific meaning on Wikipedia). I don't know enough about bluegrass to know if those festivals pass notability criteria but just haven't been created yet or if they should be removed (or both)? --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Rhododendrites. I'm afraid it's a combination of both problems. I fixed one red link which just had the wrong title, but the others are a mixed bag. I have most of them on my list for improvement/creation. There are several on the list that are definitely notable; the others need investigation. There don't seem to be many people interested in working on articles about bluegrass. I started out working in this area and then became so busy rescuing old AfC articles that I have been neglecting it. I agree about the redlinks; what if we just comment out the ones that don't exist yet, so that anyone adding a new one will see them and maybe create them? —Anne Delong (talk) 18:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
@Anne Delong: that sounds like a perfectly good approach to me. Do you want to do that or should I? (Presuming nobody else weighs in to disagree) --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Rhododendrites, I have gone ahead and done it. If anyone objects, I will happily be reverted. —Anne Delong (talk) 18:39, 13 October 2014 (UTC)