Template talk:Did you know/British Library, Add. 17212
British Library, Add. 17212
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)
- ... that British Library, Add. 17212 is a rare example of a double palimpsest with three successive writing?
- Reviewed: Nepalese Chamber of Commerce, Lhasa ([1])
Created by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 03:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Long enough, from today. Sourcing is fine, but one bare URL needs to be attended to. I've placed an orphan tag, but I'm sure that won't be hard to sort out. One book is quoted twice (different page numbers) and the shortened footnotes system would be a more elegant way of referencing that. I can convert the article to that referencing system for you if you wish (drop me a note on my talk page if you want me to go ahead). Schwede66 06:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
I nominated this article a little too early and you were very fast. It is no longer orphan. There is no bare URL; the page numbers are correct, Diringer in one part of book described some palimpsests, in another part - the provenance and later history of the Nitrian manuscripts. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 07:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Good to go. Schwede66 21:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook
- Length, format, content rules –
- Source –
- Interest –
- Image suitability, if applicable –
- ALT hooks, if proposed –
Article
- Length –
- Vintage –
- Sourcing (V, RS, BLP) –
- Neutrality –
- Plagiarism/close paraphrasing –
- copyvio (files) –
- Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting –