Template talk:GFDL-self-with-disclaimers

Template:GFDL-self-with-disclaimers is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Explanation of the move from {{GFDL-self-with-disclaimers}} to {{GFDL-self-en}}

I was asked to provide an explanation.

All free images on all wikis will ideally be moved to commons.
It would be on the best interest of the common goal of the free encyclopedia (Wikipedia) and free image repository (Commons) for the license templates to have identical naming.
Naming of license templates on commons are done with multilingualism in mind. A person editing/reviewing commons may not necessarily know any English. Preferably we avoid giving any language a priority. The -en here is the ISO code for English.
"with-disclaimers" is a problem not unique to English wikipedia. There were wikis that copied the en.wikipedia license template with it's emphasis on disclaimers. This can cause a possible problems when images are moved to commons because we have many flavors of the GFDL template.

-- Cat ^chi? 05:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

- - - Please discuss this on Template talk:GFDL-with-disclaimers, to keep all the discussion together. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imbox standarization

{{imbox
| type      = license
| image     = [[Image:Heckert GNU white.svg|52px|GFDL]]
| text      = 
I, the creator of this work, hereby grant the permission to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the '''[[Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation License]]''', Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. Subject to [[Wikipedia:general disclaimer|disclaimers]].
}}{{image other 
| [[Category:Self-published work|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:GFDL images with disclaimers|{{PAGENAME}}]]
}}{{free media}}<noinclude>

{{pp-template|small=yes}}
{{Documentation}}
<!-- Add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage, not here! -->
</noinclude>

Kelly ^hi! 13:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done by David. — Edokter • Talk • 14:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edokter: Hehe, editconflict, you are too fast.

Kelly: Ah, nice to see so well worked through code. And you already made the /doc page and redirected its /doc talk page and all! --David Göthberg (talk) 15:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Putting into a sub category of Category:GFDL images

See Template_talk:GFDL-self#Putting_into_a_sub_category_of_Category:GFDL_images. --MGA73 (talk) 11:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fix parameter dw used as template

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The template needs to be fixed by inserting right-brace "}" in the unclosed triple curly braces of parameter dw in "{{#ifeq:{{{dw}}|yes" before the "|yes". The syntax glitch was introduced on 15 May 2013 (see edit: dif509), as a link to redlink Template:Dw in 20,282 pages. After update, then the edit-preview of this template will no longer show "Template:Dw" in the list of templates used.
Impact: Over 20,280 pages. -Wikid77 (talk) 09:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Nice catch! — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 11:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice about removing disclaimers

I just made a suggestion at Template_talk:GFDL-with-disclaimers#Notice_about_removing_disclaimers. Feel free to comment there. --MGA73 (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]