Template talk:Infobox government

This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Withdraw, 8 December 2020, see discussion.
Keep, 2020 March 19, see discussion.

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles

Politics

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles

Proposal to add a second "division" to aid the usage of Template for Local Government

Currently, there is one "division" and "division_type." Adding a second one expand the usability of the Infobox for Local Government or third-level government with a rare forms of government structures. My proposal, as follows:

If the second division is used, it would become the jurisdiction of the government, and the first division would become the intermediate government/administrative level, such as state, province or territory.
If the second division is not used, it would be ignored, and the first division would become the jurisdiction of the government.

Alternatively, if we can be more ambitious, instead of two divisions, four divisions, such that:

Division 4: City/Town/Communes
Division 3: County/District/Cantons/Department
Division 2: Metropolitan Area
Division 1: State/Province/Territory/Oblast/Region
Country

I recommend using the Divisions, as some of the levels could vary across countries, sometimes even within a country. For instance, some Metropolitan Area may contain more than one State, and some maybe within one State. The generic name "Division" will allow flexibility and allow customization based on hierarchy levels. Considering the Infobox is used for rare form of government, allowing for such flexibility and adaptability would be increase the appropriateness and usability of the infobox across various contexts.

2861969nyc (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom, Canada, Australia & New Zealand

I've noticed that Government of the United Kingdom & Government of New Zealand have one kind of infobox. While Government of Canada & Australian Government have another kind. All four are constitutional monarchies (with the same individual as monarch) & thus all are Westminster governments types. My question is - Shouldn't all four have the same infobox structure? GoodDay (talk) 04:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay Hi there. I also noticed it myself. But I think it all got clear to me after seeing that in Government, there could be Executive, Legislature, Judiciary, and any other level of government a Government employs. So, this Infobox government is supposed to be for an article that discusses the Government of a country, state, province, district, etc, generally, i.e., talks about all the forms of government the Government employs; while the Infobox executive government should be used on articles that talks about ONLY the executive branch of a government. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which ever is chosen (Template:Infobox government or Template:Infobox executive government), should be used on all four pages, IMHO. GoodDay (talk) 19:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning "Infobox government" & the Westminster system. Is there a way on the federal level, to replace the terminology 'head of state', 'vice-regal' & 'head of government'? with "monarch", "governor-general", "prime minister"? On the provincial/state etc level, with "monarch", "governor" or "lieutenant governor", "premier"? GoodDay (talk) 03:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like an abandoned page and wouldn’t recommend doing an RfC, you can simply modify it yourself if you have understanding of template codes. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]