Template talk:Nuclide

Seems that there is no talk page for this? There is a Tfm for {{nuclide}} and {{nuclide2}}. Does anyone here even notice? Since this one transcludes {{nuclide2}}, seems to me that instead of merging, we could just propose {{nuclide}} for deletion. That means that all the uses of this one should be change to {{nuclide2}} before the deletion. Putting the TFM notice in the templates really messes up tables that they are use in. That should encourage users of this one to change. Gah4 (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

In case anyone doesn't know, this template transcludes {{nuclide2}}. There is a merge proposal, but it doesn't seem to me what is really needed. There is nothing wrong with {{nuclide2}}, so it makes more sense just to delete this one. Before that can be done, someone (or someones) need to change all the articles that use this one. If a bot can do that, it should be pretty easy. It takes some work for a person. The tables I use {{nuclide2}} in are program generated, so it isn't so hard to change, but then again they don't need changing. I suppose there are some that really need merging, but in many cases it is more work than it is worth. Gah4 (talk) 22:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

I'm the guy that created this template and Nuclide2. I created the later because this one had some problems that were hard to fix without changing the arguments, which would break existing use of the template. I had already use this template on too many pages to change it manually and I didn't have a bot to automatically change it. So, I created a new template and put a large notice on this, the old one, not to use it. I also asked this template to be deleted at some point, which now might finally be happening (yay!). I think it's almost ten years overdue...

There is no reason for the Nuclide2 template to have a "2" in its name other than the above history. Once Nuclide is gone, Nuclide2 should be renamed. For all intents and purposes, this is the same as merging them.

This page is not the right place for a discussion; the tfm page is where you should voice your opinion about it, as that's where the decision will be made. — SkyLined (talk) 23:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes I agree, and will continue there. I put this one here, just in case someone only reads it here. Gah4 (talk) 02:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Testing

Test of this template: ¹
₁H
⁴
₂He
⁷
₃Li
⁹
₄Be
¹¹
₅B
¹²
₆C
¹⁴
₇N
¹⁶
₈O
¹⁹
₉F
²⁰
₁₀Ne
²³
₁₁Na
²⁴
₁₂Mg
²⁷
₁₃Al
²⁸
₁₄Si
³¹
₁₅P
³³
₁₆S
³⁵
₁₇Cl
⁴⁰
₁₈Ar
³⁹
₁₉K
⁴⁰
₂₀Ca
⁴⁵
₂₁Sc
⁴⁸
₂₂Ti
⁵¹
₂₃V
⁵²
₂₄Cr
⁵⁵
₂₅Mn
⁵⁶
₂₆Fe
⁵⁹
₂₇Co
⁵⁸
₂₈Ni
⁶³
₂₉Cu
⁶⁴
₃₀Zn
⁶⁹
₃₁Ga
⁷⁴
₃₂Ge
⁷⁵
₃₃As
⁸⁰
₃₄Se
⁷⁹
₃₅Br
⁸⁴
₃₆Kr
⁸⁵
₃₇Rb
⁸⁸
₃₈Sr
⁸⁹
₃₉Y
⁹⁰
₄₀Zr
⁹³
₄₁Nb
⁹⁸
₄₂Mo
⁹⁹
₄₃Tc
¹⁰²
₄₄Ru
¹⁰³
₄₅Rh
¹⁰⁶
₄₆Pd
¹⁰⁷
₄₇Ag
¹¹⁴
₄₈Cd
¹¹⁵
₄₉In
¹¹⁸
₅₀Sn
¹²¹
₅₁Sb
¹³⁰
₅₂Te
¹²⁷
₅₃I
¹³²
₅₄Xe
¹³³
₅₅Cs
¹³⁸
₅₆Ba
¹³⁹
₅₇La
¹⁴⁰
₅₈Ce
¹⁴¹
₅₉Pr
¹⁴²
₆₀Nd
¹⁴⁵
₆₁Pm
¹⁵²
₆₂Sm
¹⁵³
₆₃Eu
¹⁵⁸
₆₄Gd
¹⁵⁹
₆₅Tb
¹⁶⁴
₆₆Dy
¹⁶⁵
₆₇Ho
¹⁶⁶
₆₈Er
¹⁶⁹
₆₉Tm
¹⁷⁴
₇₀Yb
¹⁷⁵
₇₁Lu
¹⁷⁸
₇₂Hf
¹⁸¹
₇₃Ta
¹⁸⁴
₇₄W
¹⁸⁷
₇₅Re
¹⁹²
₇₆Os
¹⁹³
₇₇Ir
¹⁹⁵
₇₈Pt
¹⁹⁷
₇₉Au
²⁰²
₈₀Hg
²⁰⁵
₈₁Tl
²⁰⁸
₈₂Pb
²⁰⁹
₈₃Bi
²¹⁰
₈₄Po
²¹⁰
₈₅At
²²²
₈₆Rn
²²³
₈₇Fr
²²⁶
₈₈Ra
²²⁷
₈₉Ac
²³²
₉₀Th
²³¹
₉₁Pa
²³⁸
₉₂U
²³⁷
₉₃Np
²⁴⁴
₉₄Pu
²⁴³
₉₅Am
²⁴⁷
₉₆Cm
²⁴⁷
₉₇Bk
²⁵¹
₉₈Cf
²⁵²
₉₉Es
²⁵⁷
₁₀₀Fm
²⁵⁸
₁₀₁Md
²⁵⁹
₁₀₂No
²⁶²
₁₀₃Lr
²⁶¹
₁₀₄Rf
²⁶²
₁₀₅Db
²⁶⁶
₁₀₆Sg
²⁶⁴
₁₀₇Bh
²⁷⁷
₁₀₈Hs
²⁶⁸
₁₀₉Mt
²⁸¹
₁₁₀Ds
²⁷²
₁₁₁Rg
²⁸⁵
₁₁₂Cn
²⁸⁹
₁₁₄Fl
²⁹²
₁₁₆Lv
Gah4 (talk) 00:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

What Links Here

Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Nuclide Gah4 (talk) 05:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

DigitsInNumber

Template {{DigitsInNumber}} is used but does not exist. --Obsuser (talk) 05:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

FWIW it was deleted 03:16, 27 May 2008, so this does not appear to cause much problems. - SkyLined — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.45.178.169 (talk)