Template talk:Reliable medical sources please

New template

I see a lot of editors who add stuff without any references. I plan to use this as a quick way to provide instructive information.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:35, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very useful, James. But don't forget to substitute the template: {{subst:RSPlease}} when using it on a user talk page; otherwise, the next editor who hits the [edit] link to comment in that section ends up editing the template! Cheers --RexxS (talk) 23:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

guess what I just did, sheesh. Bfpage |leave a message 19:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

RSPlease is a bit generic for this specific template. "Reliable Source Please" doesn't indicate anything about the medical world.

Perhaps it should be renamed as RSmed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.122.20.56 (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The people who use it know what it means and at this point there is no conflict with the names of other templates. We can of course change things should some naming conflict arise. Jytdog (talk) 17:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Including how to cite

Can we please have two versions of this, one with the citation instructions and one without? I just used this after I reverted a person who was very painstaking in doing the citation correctly -- but cited non-MEDRS sources -- and using this made me look like an ass. Would not have used it if I had known it had changed to include citation instructions. There are times when that would be very helpful, tho. So both would be better. Jytdog (talk) 23:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and re-created the old version. It is here: Template:RSPleaseOld Jytdog (talk) 06:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New image

Doc James Just wanted to let you know I created a new screenshot of how to use Citoid. The old one was quite outdated. —comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Waddie96 excellent. Is this the default for new users now? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doc James I believe so, yes. Should we update the instructions? Simply paste the PMID or ISBN in the automatic searchbox and a citation will be created once the editor presses 'Insert'. —comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC) Should I create a new screenshot showing the automatic searchbox or leave the manual one as is? —comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to update to what the instructions would be for the default settings. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:24, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Doc James. I've updated the instructions, let me know what you think it it's simple enough for new users? We could use the instructions at Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Citoid#Testing they also seem pretty basic and more step-by-step.—comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:29, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it's the default for registered users but not for IP users... Is that okay? I doubt we'd ever send this template to an IP user. —comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The default for newly registered and IP users is not the same? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doc James Nope I just tested, IP users get the old one (screenshot), newly registered users get Citoid and the new toolbar (screenshot). —comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:59, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I created a new user called User:Rosesareblue2, and I'm not sure what to do with it now, how can I get it deleted? Or should I declare it, albeit I'm never going to need to use it again so I'd prefer to get rid of it. —comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:59, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just declare. You are allowed to have a disclosed another account for testing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have done so. —comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 13:29, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]