Template talk:R to subpage

Template:R to subpage is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit extended-protected}} to notify an administrator, template editor or extended-confirmed editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Redirect Template‑class

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of redirects and their categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects. This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect pages
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

MoS[edit]

It isn't quite clear to me why redirects to MoS pages are excluded. I saw this template on a couple of redirects and now accidentally tagged almost 50 of other ones before noticing that rule existed. Isn't the use of it more about the technical feature and not the contents of the pages? I wonder if there are other families of subpages in project namespace which, when redirect targets, should be considered separate pages anyway if we followed the same logic. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Paine Ellsworth: What do you think? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To editor 1234qwer1234qwer4: thank you for asking me! Frankly, I don't understand it either. Nor have I seen a community consensus for the opinion that MoS pages should be excluded. There doesn't seem to be any coverage of this at WP:Subpages, so this appears to be the opinion of one or a few editors with whom I disagree. Guess I've acquiesced because there have been other more pressing editing needs for me. Might be useful to start an RfC on the subject? P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 22:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It would certainly be not wrong. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:R to sub" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R to sub and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 14#Template:R to sub until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 16:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 12 February 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change:

Diff:

24.237.4.201 (talk) 03:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On you Bigfoot Definition you relay that Bigfoot is a mythical creature. You are discounting the thousands of people who have had lifechanging encounters. You definition of mythical does not meet logical scrutiny. Thank you for correcting your error about Bigfoot. Not a mythical creature. You could say disputed or questioned, but not mythical. We have pictures, footprints, hair samples, sketches, written testimony, videos, verbal testimony by groups of people and individuals. To dismiss all this evidence is unscientific and untrue. Thank you for correcting your error in the Bigfoot definition by Wiki.

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 13:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 15 April 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change:

Diff:

35.150.34.107 (talk) 06:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]