Template talk:Slavic-language terms for administrative divisions

Russia: Language & literature / History / Human geography

	Russia portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
	This template is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force.
	This template is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This template is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.

Languages

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles

Template name concerns

The following announcement and subsequent discussion were copied from Portal:Russia/New article announcements#December 1-15. I am seeking comments regarding this template's name.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Slavic terms for country subdivisions by User:Tobias Conradi. The criterion for this assortment is not clear. For instance, there is obshchina, but no mir (social), pogost or khutor. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 07:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mir and khutor do not qualify, as technically they were not "subdivisions", but rather inhabited localities. I added pogost, though. Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Still, it is very strange to see "raion" and "selsoviet" listed among traditional "Slavic terms". --Ghirla ^-трёп- 18:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. The way this template is constructed now, the name of "Terms for subdivisions of Slavic countries" would be more appropriate. On a different note, why did you remove "powiat" and deitalicized "pogost" (which is a historical term)?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 18:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Silrada

Silrada is not a historic subdivision, but present time one.--Tomakiv (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Darugha"

Altough according to article this term was used in Russian Empire, I have a great doubts that it is correct to say that darugha is a Slavic term. Altes (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]