Jump to content

Template talk:Taxonomy/Cnidaria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2020

[edit]
Amarnathd (talk) 08:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 09:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2022

[edit]

Aurelia comes under the phylum Coelenterata not Cnidaria, please do consider this change. 117.248.122.174 (talk) 04:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template {{Taxonomy/Cnidaria}}. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. Talk:Aurelia (cnidarian) would probably be a better place. In any case, you'll need to cite reliable sources in support of your request. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2022

[edit]

The phylum Cnidaria should be set to its phylum being Cnidaria. How could it possibly be Petalonamae, an entirely extinct clade? 76.144.49.221 (talk) 06:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RealAspects (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Petalonamae?

[edit]

Why does the Cnidaria taxobox link to Petalonamae, and not to its own page? Petalonamae is a poorly known group from the Ediacaran with no known living relations -- AFAIK, it's not even clear they were animals at all. 151.30.138.200 (talk) 14:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has been fixed however it is clear from reading the profile of the person who edited it that they are not qualified to make such an edit. Crvscience2022 (talk) 22:14, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]