Template talk:Taxonomy/Cnidaria

Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2020[edit]

‹ The template below (Edit semi-protected) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

This edit request to Template:Taxonomy/Myxozoa has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Amarnathd (talk) 08:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 09:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2022[edit]

‹ The template below (Edit semi-protected) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Aurelia comes under the phylum Coelenterata not Cnidaria, please do consider this change. 117.248.122.174 (talk) 04:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template {{Taxonomy/Cnidaria}}. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. Talk:Aurelia (cnidarian) would probably be a better place. In any case, you'll need to cite reliable sources in support of your request. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2022[edit]

‹ The template below (Edit semi-protected) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The phylum Cnidaria should be set to its phylum being Cnidaria. How could it possibly be Petalonamae, an entirely extinct clade? 76.144.49.221 (talk) 06:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RealAspects (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Petalonamae?[edit]

Why does the Cnidaria taxobox link to Petalonamae, and not to its own page? Petalonamae is a poorly known group from the Ediacaran with no known living relations -- AFAIK, it's not even clear they were animals at all. 151.30.138.200 (talk) 14:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has been fixed however it is clear from reading the profile of the person who edited it that they are not qualified to make such an edit. Crvscience2022 (talk) 22:14, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]