User:AMileAMinute/Wildlife corridor
First Section I Am Working On - AMileAMinute
[edit]A wildlife corridor, also known as a habitat corridor, or green corridor, is an designated area that connects wildlife populations that have been separated by human activities or structures, such as development, roads, or land clearings. These corridors enable movement of individuals between populations, which helps prevent negative effects of inbreeding and reduced genetic diversity, often caused by genetic drift, that can occur in isolated populations. Additionally, corridors support the re-establishment of populations that may have been reduced or wiped out due to random events like fires or disease. They can also mitigate some of the severe impacts of habitat fragmentation, a result of urbanization that divides habitat areas and restricts animal movement. Habitat fragmentation from human development poses an increasing threat to biodiversity, and habitat corridors help to reduce its harmful effects. Corridors aside from their benefit to vulnerable wildlife populations can conflict with communities surrounding them when human-wildlife conflicts are involved.[1] In other communities the benefits of wildlife corridors to wildlife conservation are used and managed by indigenous communities.[2]
Second Section I Am Working On
[edit]Purpose
[edit]Habitat corridors can be considered a management tool in areas where the destruction of a natural habitats has severely impacted native species, whether due to human development or natural disasters. When land is fragmented, wildlife populations may become unstable or isolated from larger populations.[3] These management tools are used by ecologists, biologists, indigenous tribes, and other concerned parties that oversee wildlife populations. Corridors help reconnect these fragmented populations and reduce negative population fluctuations by supporting these key aspects that stabilize populations[4]:
- Colonization: Animals can move and occupy new areas when food sources or other natural resources are scarce in their primary habitat.
- Migration: Species that relocate seasonally can do so more safely and effectively without interference from human development barriers.
- Interbreeding: Animals can find new mates in neighboring regions, increasing genetic diversity.
- Tribes: Indigenous groups use wildlife corridors as an effective management strategy to sustain their physical and spiritual needs.[2]
Third Section I am Working On
[edit]Monitoring use
[edit]Researchers use mark-recapture techniques and hair snares to assess genetic flow and observe how wildlife utilizes corridors.[5] Marking and recapturing animals helps track individual movement.[6]
Genetic testing is also used to evaluate migration and mating patterns. By analyzing gene flow within a population, researchers can better understand the long- term role of corridors in migration and genetic diversity.[7]
Section I am adding
[edit]Human factor
[edit]Wildlife corridors can connect into federal, state, private, and tribal land which can influence the opposition or acceptance of including wildlife corridors. With development of man made structures and expansion into natural areas can have an impact on both human and wildlife.[8] Although expressions such as "freedom to roam" promote the idea of wildlife freely moving throughout natural landscapes, this same ideology does not apply to indigenous peoples.[9] The theoretical ideas of landscape connectivity present them in a purely scientific and non-political manner that fails to account for political factors that can impact success within wildlife corridors and restorative ecological practices.[9][10] Attempts to restore habitat over time require support from the local communities that surround the habitat area, often times these communities are indigenous, that a restoration project is being placed around. [11]
Indigenous knowledge of ecological landscape features across history is usually substituted with European explorers' of landscape ecology recollections when developing widescale corridor plans and within the broader ecological field.[9][12][8] As such there is a distinction in the use of ecological and indigenous knowledge when taking into account where wildlife populations are found, species composition within a community, and even seasonal patterns lengths and changes.[11][13] Widespread efforts that actively involve the input of a variety of political and environmental groups are not always used in ecological restoration efforts. Currently there are some collaborations ongoing between Indigenous groups surrounding wildlife corridor habitat such as the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative which promote the conversion of previously stolen land into indigenously managed land.[9] The concern regarding land once used and lived upon by Indigenous people, which now makes up habitat within wildlife corridors, and developed land that corridors cut across contribute to the Land Back movement.[9]
Managing both terrestrial and aquatic lands can have a positive economic impact on Indigenous groups that continue to rely on wildlife populations for cultural practices, fishing, hunting, etc. in a variety of natural landscapes.[8][14] Indigenous groups face financial inequities despite the large benefits of conservation efforts; this if the result of a lack of consideration placed on how wildlife corridors can impact local communities.[8] The overlap of wildlife, specifically larger predator species, poses a physical danger to local communities.[15] Economic revenue for local groups nearby or within heavily forested areas poses a threat to human property, crops, and livestock with higher chances of wildlife encounters; fisheries can also be negatively impacted by wilderness areas.[15]
References
[edit]- ^ Matejcek, Astrid; Verne, Julia (2021-08-01). "Restoration-as-development? Contesting Aspirational Politics Regarding the Restoration of Wildlife Corridors in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania". The European Journal of Development Research. 33 (4): 1022–1043. doi:10.1057/s41287-021-00403-2. ISSN 1743-9728.
- ^ a b Fallon, Cait (Aug 23, 2021). ""Tribal Wildlife Corridors Act Bolsters Wildlife Conservation on Tribal Lands"". National Wildlife Federation. Retrieved October 26, 2024.
- ^ Beier, Paul; Majka, Daniel R.; Spencer, Wayne D. (August 2008). ""Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages"". Conservation Biology. 22 (4): 836–851. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x. ISSN 0888-8892.
- ^ Barbosa, Soraia; Mestre, Frederico; White, Thomas A.; Paupério, Joana; Alves, Paulo C.; Searle, Jeremy B. (September 2018). ""Integrative approaches to guide conservation decisions: Using genomics to define conservation units and functional corridors"". Molecular Ecology. 27 (17): 3452–3465. doi:10.1111/mec.14806. ISSN 0962-1083.
- ^ Dixon, Jeremy D.; Oli, Madan K.; Wooten, Michael C.; Eason, Thomas H.; McCown, J. Walter; Paetkau, David (2006). "Effectiveness of a Regional Corridor in Connecting Two Florida Black Bear Populations". Conservation Biology. 20 (1): 155–162. Bibcode:2006ConBi..20..155D. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00292.x. ISSN 0888-8892. JSTOR 3591161. PMID 16909668. S2CID 15106420. Archived from the original on 19 May 2023. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- ^ Mech, Stephen G.; Hallett, James G. (April 2001). "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Corridors: a Genetic Approach". Conservation Biology. 15 (2): 467–474. Bibcode:2001ConBi..15..467M. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002467.x. ISSN 0888-8892. S2CID 84520743. Archived from the original on 13 August 2023. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
- ^ Mech, Stephen G.; Hallett, James G. (April 2001). "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Corridors: a Genetic Approach". Conservation Biology. 15 (2): 467–474. Bibcode:2001ConBi..15..467M. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002467.x. ISSN 0888-8892. S2CID 84520743. Archived from the original on 13 August 2023. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
- ^ a b c d Gurney, Georgina G.; Darling, Emily S.; Ahmadia, Gabby N.; Agostini, Vera N.; Ban, Natalie C.; Blythe, Jessica; Claudet, Joachim; Epstein, Graham; Estradivari; Himes-Cornell, Amber; Jonas, Harry D.; Armitage, Derek; Campbell, Stuart J.; Cox, Courtney; Friedman, Whitney R. (July 26, 2021). "Biodiversity needs every tool in the box: use OECMs". Nature. 595 (7869): 646–649. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02041-4.
- ^ a b c d e Brown, Nicholas Anthony (2022-03-04). "Continental Land Back: Managing Mobilities and Enacting Relationalities in Indigenous Landscapes". Mobilities. 17 (2). doi:10.1080/17450101.2021.2012503. ISSN 1745-0101 – via Taylor & Francis Online.
- ^ Kelly, Jennifer Rebecca (October–December 2019). "A Sociocultural Perspective: Human Conflict with Jaguars and Pumas in Costa Rica". Conservation and Society. 17 (4): 355. doi:10.4103/cs.cs_17_141. ISSN 0972-4923 – via Wolters Kluwer.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b Haq, Shiekh Marifatul; Pieroni, Andrea; Bussmann, Rainer W.; Abd-ElGawad, Ahmed M.; El-Ansary, Hosam O. (2023-08-10). "Integrating traditional ecological knowledge into habitat restoration: implications for meeting forest restoration challenges". Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 19 (1): 33. doi:10.1186/s13002-023-00606-3. ISSN 1746-4269. PMC 10413632. PMID 37559120.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Gordon (Iñupiaq), Heather Sauyaq Jean; Ross, J. Ashleigh; Cheryl Bauer-Armstrong; Moreno, Maria; Byington (Choctaw), Rachel; Bowman (Lunaape/Mohican), Nicole (2023-02-01). "Integrating Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge of land into land management through Indigenous-academic partnerships". Land Use Policy. 125: 106469. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106469. ISSN 0264-8377.
- ^ Klein, Julia A.; Hopping, Kelly A.; Yeh, Emily T.; Nyima, Yonten; Boone, Randall B.; Galvin, Kathleen A. (September 2014). "Unexpected climate impacts on the Tibetan Plateau: Local and scientific knowledge in findings of delayed summer". Global Environmental Change. 28: 141–152. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.007.
- ^ "The Economic, Socio-Cultural, and Ecological Benefits of Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas in British Columbia" (PDF). Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative. May 2023. Retrieved December 9, 2024.
{{cite web}}
: line feed character in|title=
at position 34 (help)CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b Kelly, Jennifer Rebecca (December 2019). "A Sociocultural Perspective: Human Conflict with Jaguars and Pumas in Costa Rica". Conservation and Society. 17 (4): 355. doi:10.4103/cs.cs_17_141. ISSN 0972-4923.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
To peer-reviewers! I added the Tribes section near the bottom, linked biologists to the sandbox article, added a citation to the second and fourth sentence. I also changed some of the grammar of the fourth sentence as it did not flow well or make sense. Along with adding the tribe bullet point I attached a citation at the end of the sentence. I also added two sentences at the bottom of the introduction!
First Section I Am Working On - typedfrommycomputer
[edit]To my Peer Reviewers I've added everything that was in bold a few sentences in all that was typed. I added some to text to examples section and expanded on the Florida Wildlife Corridor. I also added a few more citations to my bibliography
Examples
[edit]In Alberta, Canada, overpasses have been constructed to keep animals off the Trans-Canada Highway, which passes through Banff National Park. The tops of the bridges are planted with trees and native grasses, with fences present on either side to help guide animals.[1]
In Southern California, 15 underpasses and drainage culverts were observed to see how many animals used them as corridors. They proved to be especially effective on wide-ranging species such as carnivores, mule deer, small mammals, and reptiles, even though the corridors were not intended specifically for animals. Researchers also learned that factors such as surrounding habitat, underpass dimensions, and human activity played a role in the frequency of usage.[2]
In South Carolina, five remnant areas of land were monitored; one was put in the center with the other four surrounding it. Then, a corridor was put between one of the remnants and the center. Butterflies that were placed in the center habitat were two to four times more likely to move to the connected remnant rather than the disconnected ones. Furthermore, male holly plants were placed in the center region, and female holly plants in the connected region increased by 70 percent in seed production compared to those plants in the disconnected region. Plant seed dispersal through bird droppings was noted to be the dispersal method with the largest increase within the corridor-connected patch of land.[3]
In Florida June 2021, the Florida Wildlife Corridor act was passed, securing a statewide network of nearly 18 million acres of connected ecosystems and benefiting vulnerable species like Florida black bears, panthers, and other animals.[4] Starting from the Alabama state line, through the Florida panhandle and all the way to the Florida Keys. Connecting the Osceola National Forest to the Everglades National Park with state parks, forests, and wildlife management areas supporting wildlife and human occupation.[5]
The positive effects on the rates of transfer and interbreeding in vole populations. A control population in which voles were confined to their core habitat with no corridor was compared to a treatment population in their core habitat with passages that they use to move to other regions. Females typically stayed and mated within their founder population, but the rate of transfer through corridors in the males was very high.[6]
In 2001, a wolf corridor was restored through a golf course in Jasper National Park, Alberta, which successfully altered wildlife behavior and showed frequent use by the wolf population.[7][8]
Major wildlife corridors
[edit]- The Paséo Pantera (also known as the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor or Paséo del Jaguar)[9]
- The Eastern Himalayan Corridor[10]
- China-Russia Tiger Corridor[11]
- Tandai Tiger Corridor[12]
- The European Green Belt[13]
- The Siju-Rewak Corridor, located in the Garo Hills of India, protects an important population of elephants (thought to be approximately 20% of all the elephants that survive in the country). This corridor project links together the Siju Wildlife Sanctuary and the Rewak Reserve Forest in Meghalaya State, close to the India-Bangladesh border. This area lies within the meeting place of the Himalayan Mountain Range and the Indian Peninsula and contains at least 139 other species of mammals, including tigers, clouded leopards and the Himalayan black bear.[14]
- The Ecologische hoofdstructuur is a network of corridors and habitats created for wildlife in the Netherlands[15]
- The 16 kilometres (9.9 mi) long Kanha-Pench elevated corridor on NH 44.[16]
- Two elephant passes and two minor bridges on NH 54 in Assam’s Lumding Reserve Forest.[17][18]
- Three elephant underpasses, each with 6 metres (20 ft) of vertical clearance on NH 72 and NH 58 in Uttarakhand, India.[19]
- Terai Arc Landscapes, Lower Himalayan Region.[20]
- The Panther Glades in southern Florida.[21]
Second Section I Am Working On
[edit]- ^ Dickie, Gloria (2022-07-22). "As Banff's famed wildlife overpasses turn 20, the world looks to Canada for conservation inspiration". Canadian Geographic. Retrieved 2024-02-26.
- ^ Ng, Sandra J; Dole, Jim W; Sauvajot, Raymond M; Riley, Seth P.D; Valone, Thomas J (2003-03-20). "Use of highway undercrossings by wildlife in southern California". Biological Conservation. 115 (3): 499–507. Bibcode:2004BCons.115..499N. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00166-6.
- ^ Susan Milius (2002-10-22). "Insects, pollen, seeds travel wildlife corridors". Science News. Archived from the original on 4 November 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
- ^ Realm, Visual. "About The Corridor". Florida Wildlife Corridor Foundation. Retrieved 2024-11-13.
- ^ "Preserve or develop? The race against time to protect Florida's Wildlife Corridor". WUSF. 2024-05-06. Retrieved 2024-11-19.
- ^ Jon Aars; Rolf A. Ims (1999-07-01). "The Effect of Habitat Corridors on Rates of Transfer and Interbreeding Between Vole Demes". Ecology. 80 (5): 1648. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1648:TEOHCO]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0012-9658. Archived from the original on 4 November 2022. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
- ^ Shepherd, B; J. Whittington (2006). "Response of wolves to corridor restoration and human use management". Ecology and Society. 11 (2). doi:10.5751/ES-01813-110201.
- ^ Daniel K. Rosenberg; Barry R. Noon; E. Charles Meslow (November 1997). "Biological Corridors: Form, Function, and Efficacy". BioScience. 47 (10): 677–687. doi:10.2307/1313208. JSTOR 1313208.
- ^ "Paseo Pantera Project". Archived from the original on 9 November 2022. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
- ^ "Map of Nepal". Archived from the original on 2023-04-12.
- ^ "New corridor links Amur tiger habitats in Russia and China". WWF. Archived from the original on 9 November 2022. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
- ^ "Panthera". Panthera.org. Archived from the original on 22 November 2011. Retrieved 4 August 2015.
- ^ "European Green Belt Initiative". Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
- ^ "Siju-Rewak Corridor". CONSERVATION CORRIDOR. 2012-05-02. Archived from the original on 9 November 2022. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
- ^ Ecologische Hoofdstructuur
- ^ Gandhi, Divya (2019-09-07). "A wild, wild road". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 9 November 2022. Retrieved 2020-09-17.
- ^ "Why This Elevated Stretch On National Highway 44 Is A Hit With Animals In Pench Tiger Reserve". India Infra Hub. 2020-02-25. Archived from the original on 9 November 2022. Retrieved 2020-09-17.
- ^ Singh A.P.; Singh A.K.; Mishra D.K.; Bora P.; Sharma A. (2010). Ensuring safe access to wildlife in Lumding Reserve Forest, Assam, India, Mitigating the impacts of up-gradation of Doboka-Silchar National Highway (NH54E) (PDF). WWF-India. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
- ^ SHIVANI AZAD (2019-01-18). "Elephant underpass in Rajaji hanging for 9 yrs, NGT orders NHAI to deposit Rs 2 cr". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 9 November 2022. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
- ^ Chauhan, Priya (2021-04-01). "26 Important Wildlife Corridors Providing Safe Passage to Species". Planet Custodian. Archived from the original on 23 April 2021. Retrieved 2021-04-23.
- ^ Palmer, Avery. "Panther Glades". Florida Wildlife Corridor Foundation. Retrieved 2024-11-19.