User:Donnie Park/French football bribery scandal

This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs
This page was last edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) 2 years ago. (Update timer)

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request an experienced editor review it for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

New article name goes here new article content ...

known as the Affaire VA-OM

1992–93 French Division 1 Bernard Tapie Christophe Robert, Jorge Burruchaga and Jacques Glassmann claimed that the Marseille midfielder Jean-Jacques Eydelie

^[1] ^[2] ^[3] ^[4] ^[5] ^[6] ^[7] ^[8] ^[9] ^[10] ^[11]^[12]

References[edit]

^ "Argentine Charged in Marseille case". New York Times. 1993-07-02. Retrieved 2007-03-12.
^ "Wenger slams former Marseille Chairman". Eurosport. 2006-01-23. Retrieved 2007-03-12.
^ "From Glory to Disgrace: Soccer Saga Grips Marseille". International Herald Tribune. 1992-07-12. Retrieved 2007-03-12. ^{[dead link]}
^ "Former Marseille chairman to sue ex-player for libel". ESPN Soccernet. 2006-01-22. Retrieved 2007-03-12.
^ "Dishing the Dirt". World Cup Blog. 2006-02-17. Retrieved 2007-03-12.
^ "1992/93: French first for Marseille". UEFA. 26 May 1993. Archived from the original on January 2, 2007. Retrieved 7 December 2015.
^ "France's passion play". FIFA. Retrieved 25 October 2009.
^ "Tapie Directly Implicated As Marseille Trial Opens". International Herald Tribune. 14 March 1995. Retrieved 2007-03-12.
^ "From Glory to Disgrace: Soccer Saga Grips Marseille". The New York Times. 12 July 1993. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
^ "Marseille: the French exception". FIFA. 13 August 2008. Retrieved 24 April 2010.
^ "Scandal leaves a stain on the white shirt of Marseille". The Independent. 13 July 1993. Retrieved 28 October 2009.
^ Le PSG est vice-champion d'un championnat sans champion suite au déclassement de l'Olympique de Marseille (Affaire VA-OM). Canal+ a refusé le titre de champion pour le PSG car la chaîne cryptée ne voulait pas se fâcher avec ses abonnés de province. On lira sur cette affaire, Jean-François Pérès et Daniel Riolo, OM-PSG, PSG-OM. Les meilleurs ennemis, enquête sur une rivalité, Paris, Mango Sport, 2003, p. 131–133: "Dans cette affaire, le PSG va plutôt choisir l'« intérêt supérieur de Canal+ » et s'obstiner dans son refus."

External links[edit]

www.example.com

[nyt-1] "Argentine Charged in Marseille case". New York Times. 1993-07-02. Retrieved 2007-03-12.

[eurosport-2] "Wenger slams former Marseille Chairman". Eurosport. 2006-01-23. Retrieved 2007-03-12.

[iht-3] "From Glory to Disgrace: Soccer Saga Grips Marseille". International Herald Tribune. 1992-07-12. Retrieved 2007-03-12. ^{[dead link]}

[soccernet-4] "Former Marseille chairman to sue ex-player for libel". ESPN Soccernet. 2006-01-22. Retrieved 2007-03-12.

[deschamps-5] "Dishing the Dirt". World Cup Blog. 2006-02-17. Retrieved 2007-03-12.

[6] "1992/93: French first for Marseille". UEFA. 26 May 1993. Archived from the original on January 2, 2007. Retrieved 7 December 2015.

[7] "France's passion play". FIFA. Retrieved 25 October 2009.

[8] "Tapie Directly Implicated As Marseille Trial Opens". International Herald Tribune. 14 March 1995. Retrieved 2007-03-12.

[9] "From Glory to Disgrace: Soccer Saga Grips Marseille". The New York Times. 12 July 1993. Retrieved 1 February 2011.

[10] "Marseille: the French exception". FIFA. 13 August 2008. Retrieved 24 April 2010.

[11] "Scandal leaves a stain on the white shirt of Marseille". The Independent. 13 July 1993. Retrieved 28 October 2009.

[12] Le PSG est vice-champion d'un championnat sans champion suite au déclassement de l'Olympique de Marseille (Affaire VA-OM). Canal+ a refusé le titre de champion pour le PSG car la chaîne cryptée ne voulait pas se fâcher avec ses abonnés de province. On lira sur cette affaire, Jean-François Pérès et Daniel Riolo, OM-PSG, PSG-OM. Les meilleurs ennemis, enquête sur une rivalité, Paris, Mango Sport, 2003, p. 131–133: "Dans cette affaire, le PSG va plutôt choisir l'« intérêt supérieur de Canal+ » et s'obstiner dans son refus."

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]