User:Mitkoyt/sandbox
This article needs additional citations for verification. |
This article may contain an excessive number of citations. |
This "Further reading" section may need cleanup. |
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. |
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. |
This article lacks inline citations besides NRIS, a database which provides minimal and sometimes ambiguous information. |
This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. |
This article may contain excessive or inappropriate references to self-published sources. |
This article may contain inappropriate self-references to the Wikipedia project or to itself. |
This section gives self-sourcing popular culture examples. |
An editor has performed a search and found that sufficient sources exist to establish the subject's notability. |
This article may contain bundled citations with poor text–source integrity. |
This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. |
This article may contain improper references to user-generated content. |
This article's factual accuracy is disputed. |
The factual accuracy of part of this article is disputed. The dispute is about {{{1}}}. |
The truthfulness of this article has been questioned. It is believed that some or all of its content may constitute a hoax. |
This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. |
This article on a place of local interest may need more verifiable and notable information. |
This article possibly contains original research. |
This article possibly contains unsourced predictions, speculative material, or accounts of events that might not occur. Information must be verifiable and based on reliable published sources. |
This article or section possibly contains synthesis of material which does not verifiably mention or relate to the main topic. |
The verifiability of the claims made in this article is disputed. |
An editor has expressed concern that this article may have a number of irrelevant and questionable citations. |
This article uses citations that link to broken or outdated sources. |
This article includes inline citations, but they are not properly formatted. |
This article needs more complete citations for verification. |
Constructs such as ibid., loc. cit. and idem are discouraged by Wikipedia's style guide for footnotes, as they are easily broken. Please improve this article by replacing them with named references (quick guide), or an abbreviated title. |
This article cites its sources but its page reference ranges are too broad or incorrect. |
This article cites its sources but does not provide page references. |
This article uses shallow references to the home page or some other high level page of a website that contains the cited document. |
This article has an unclear citation style. |
This media article uses IMDb for verification. |
This article needs more reliable medical references for verification or relies too heavily on primary sources. |
This article may document a neologism or protologism in such a manner as to promote it. |
This article reads like a scientific review article and potentially contains biased syntheses of primary sources. |
This law-related article does not cite its references or sources. You can help Wikipedia by including appropriate citations, which can be found through legal research. Unsourced or poorly sourced material may be challenged and removed. |
This article cites Wikipedia (or sources that take information from Wikipedia) in a circular manner. |
This article may be unbalanced toward certain viewpoints. |
This section has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
War. [among whom?][according to whom?][attribution needed][by whom?][from whom?][like whom?][to whom?][who?][with whom?][ambiguous][clarification needed][timeframe?][needs context][expand acronym][incomprehensible][non sequitur][sentence fragment][which calendar?][Chinese script needed][copyright violation?][infringing link?][data missing][disambiguation needed][inappropriate external link?][improve caption][needs IPA][original research?][pronunciation?][native script needed][spam link?][improper synthesis?][spelling?][whose translation?][buzzword][compared to?][editorializing][fact or opinion?][opinion][peacock prose][promotion?][unbalanced opinion?][weasel words][by how much?][when defined as?][definition needed][example needed][further explanation needed][how?][how often?][misquoted][quantify][specify][vague][when?][where?][which?][who else?][why?][year needed][importance?][relevant?][globalize][anachronism][timeframe?][may be outdated][is this date calibrated?][needs update][needs update][contradictory][inconsistent][needs independent confirmation][speculation?][bare URL][bare URL non-HTML file][bare URL AV media file][bare URL PDF][bare URL image file][bare URL DOC/DOCX file][bare URL plain text file][bare URL spreadsheet file][author incomplete][author missing][date missing][dead link][edition needed][episode needed][full citation needed][incomplete short citation][ISBN missing][moved resource?][page needed][place missing][publisher missing][season and episode needed][time needed][title incomplete][title missing][volume & issue needed][year missing][additional citation(s) needed][better source needed][better source needed][check quotation syntax][chronology citation needed][citation needed][citation not found][close paraphrasing][conflicted source?][deprecated source?][excessive citations][failed verification][image reference needed][irrelevant citation][medical citation needed][not specific enough to verify][not verified in body][obsolete source][page range too broad][non-primary source needed][promotional source?][This quote needs a citation][need quotation to verify][scientific citation needed][self-published source?][non-tertiary source needed][third-party source needed][unreliable fringe source?][unreliable medical source?][unreliable source?][verify][verification needed][buzzword][colloquialism][needs copy edit][neologism?][jargon][tone]