User:NE Ent/notepad
scrapbook
[edit][[User:Nobody Ent/Don't Underestimate the Power of The Assume Good Faith|Don't Underestimate the Power of The Assume Good Faith]] ~~~~
Don't Underestimate the Power of The Assume Good Faith
The purpose of adminship is to help the editors edit by dealing performing certain technical tasks. As these tasks (blocking users, deleting pages, protecting pages) can damage Wikipedia if used inappropriately, we have ya'll go through an Rfa first.
Wikimedia:Terms_of_Use Wikimedia:Privacy_policy
ANI is not supposed to be Wikipedia's version of the Colosseum where we engage in the public spectacle of thumbs-up, thumbs-down block this editor! (e.g. WP:PITCHFORKS).
So apparently Napoleon and Patton -- according to people way smarter than me who understand these things -- were great battlefield generals due to their use of terrain. What I do know is that on Wikipedia the territory one wants to seize is the article talk page.
File:Statue_of_Liberty_restoration_project.jpg
[1] ARCA on DS
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles/Archive 26
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Policies
Title
[edit][2] British "gravitational system" length force time, foot pound section [3] [2] banner [3]John Carter
[4] move page instructions [5]
[6] prev comments arbcom [7] username
In matters of truth and justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same. -einstein, widely attributed but rarely/never sourced
wqa on watchlist
[edit]civility
[edit]Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Civility_enforcement
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility_enforcement#Inconsistencies_in_civility_enforcement]]
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility_enforcement#Inconsistencies_in_civility_enforcement
Throughout the project, breaches of the expected level of decorum are common. These violations of the community's standards of conduct are unevenly, and often ineffectively, enforced. (1,2)
— English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee
Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Civility_enforcement [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Civility_enforcement]]
WP:ADMINACCT "Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed."
In a recent principle, arbcom explained: "Administrators are expected to behave respectfully and civilly in their interactions with others. This requirement is not lessened by perceived or actual shortcomings in the conduct of others."
arbcom comment on content
[edit]Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/TimidGuy_ban_appeal#Focus_on_the_edits_not_the_editor
9) Per policy, "as a matter of … effective discourse, comments should not be personalized. That is, they should be directed at content and actions rather than people." Disparaging an editor or casting aspersions is a personal attack, regardless of the manner in which it is done. The usual exception to this principle is reasonably expressed concerns raised within a legitimate dispute resolution process.
Per policy, "as a matter of … effective discourse, comments should not be personalized. That is, they should be directed at content and actions rather than people." Disparaging an editor or casting aspersions is a personal attack, regardless of the manner in which it is done. The usual exception to this principle is reasonably expressed concerns raised within a legitimate dispute resolution process.
reliability problem?
[edit]Does Wikipedia have an accuracy problem?
Wikipedia:No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article
invisible banner
[edit][http://www.useit.com/alertbox/fancy-formatting.html banners are invisible]
watchers
[edit]informal
[edit]Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-10-29/Recent_research#informal
ensuring participation and transparency is crucial for maintaining the stability of self-governing communities.
— Schroeder, Wagner, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology[4]
10 steps to calm angry
[edit]bad speech
[edit]the best answer for bad speech is more speech.
— Mike Godwin[5]
Berkman Sciences/Po
[edit]http://wikimedia.7.n6.nabble.com/Regarding-Berkman-Sciences-Po-study-td1467224.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-12-12/News_and_notes
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Dynamics_of_Online_Interactions_and_Behavior
Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_95#Search_banner_Wikipedia_Research_Committee
AN is community
[edit]Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Reversal_of_enforcement_actions [9]
Stop
[edit]
The final stop for disputes in Wikipedia is the Arbitration Committee (AC).
Preventative
[edit]I'm not sure if you've read the blocking policy but "preventative" goes beyond "preventing immediate damage to the encyclopedia" and into "acting as a deterrent to further issues" and "encouraging a better atmosphere".
— User:Worm That Turned
As Worm That Turned once explained: I'm not sure if you've read the blocking policy but "preventative" goes beyond "preventing immediate damage to the encyclopedia" and into "acting as a deterrent to further issues" and "encouraging a better atmosphere".
ANI
[edit]NAC RFC
[edit]Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Archive_12#Review
magic
[edit]{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}} 121,930
{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} 6,909,992
{{NUMBEROFADMINS}} 852
[http://tools.wmflabs.org/templatecount/index.php?lang=en&name=Unreferenced&namespace=10#bottom]
[15]
{{#expr: {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}|R}} / {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}}|R}} }}
56.671795292381
{{#expr: {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}|R}} /{{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFADMINS}}|R}} }}
8110.3192488263
{{#expr: {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}}|R}} / {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFADMINS}}|R}} }} 143.1103286385
{{#expr: 1 / {{formatnum:{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}}|R}} }} 8.2014270483064E-6
v: 0.0048634462396457 Wikipedia:List of administrators/Active
n * (n-1)/2: 7,433,401,485
Articles: 6,909,992 Active users: 121,930 Articles / user: 56.671795292381
| Page | Number of editors | proportion of active users | source |
|---|---|---|---|
| MFD | 29 | 0.00023784138440089 | [16] |
| Evidence | 41 | 0.00033625850898056 | [17] |
| this one | 63 | 0.0005166899040433 | [18] |
tech review
[edit]"The loose collective running the site today, estimated to be 90 percent male, operates a crushing bureaucracy with an often abrasive atmosphere that deters newcomers who might increase participation in Wikipedia and broaden its coverage."
— Tim Simonite, Technology Review [19]
early close
[edit]JW
[edit]Scripts
[edit]User:Ale_jrb/Scripts http://project.paragram.org/wpuser/ Interaction grapher
Grit
[edit]refs
[edit]- ^ Wurbs, Ralph A, Fort Hood Review Sessions for Professional Engineering Exam (PDF), retrieved June 10, 2011
- ^ Lindeburg, Michael, Civil Engineering Reference Manual for the PE Exam
- ^
Avallone, Eugene; Baumesiter III, Theodore (1978). Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers (Ninth ed.). p. 1-25. ISBN 0-07-004127-X.
{{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|trans_title=and|month=(help) - ^ Schroeder, A., Wagner, C. (2012). Governance of open content creation: A conceptualization and analysis of control and guiding mechanisms in the open content domain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(10):1947–59 DOI
- ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/20/technology/20link.html
