User:Phlsph7/Ontology - History
History
[edit]The roots of ontology in ancient philosophy are speculations about the nature of being and the source of the universe. Discussions of the essence of reality are found in the Upanishads, ancient Indian scriptures dating from as early as 700 BCE. They say that the universe has a divine foundation and discuss in what sense ultimate reality is one or many.[1] Samkhya, the first orthodox school of Indian philosophy,[a] formulated an atheist dualist ontology based on the Upanishads, identifying pure consciousness and matter as its two foundational principles.[3] The later Vaisheshika school[b] proposed a comprehensive system of categories.[5] In ancient China, Laozi's (6th century BCE)[c] Taoism examines the underlying order of the universe, known as Tao, and how this order is shaped by the interaction of two basic forces, yin and yang.[7] The philosophical movement of Xuanxue emerged in the 3rd century CE and explored the relation between being and non-being.[8]
Starting in the 6th century BCE, Presocratic philosophers in ancient Greece aimed to provide rational explanations of the universe. They suggested that a first principle, such as water or fire, is the primal source of all things.[9] Parmenides (c. 515–450 BCE) is sometimes considered the founder of ontology because of his explicit discussion of the concepts of being and non-being.[10] Inspired by Presocratic philosophy, Plato (427–347 BCE) developed his theory of forms. It distinguishes between unchangeable perfect forms and matter, which has a lower degree of existence and imitates the forms.[11] Aristotle (384–322 BCE) suggested an elaborate system of categories that introduced the concept of substance as the primary kind of being.[12] The school of Neoplatonism arose in the 3rd century CE and proposed an ineffable source of everything, called the One, which is more basic than being itself.[13]
The problem of universals was an influential topic in medieval ontology. Boethius (477–524 CE) suggested that universals can exist not only in matter but also in the mind. This view inspired Peter Abelard (1079–1142 CE), who proposed that universals exist only in the mind.[14] Thomas Aquinas (1224–1274 CE) developed and refined fundamental ontological distinctions, such as the contrast between existence and essence, between substance and accidents, and between matter and form.[15] He also discussed the transcendentals, which are the most general properties or modes of being.[16] John Duns Scotus (1266–1308) argued that all entities, including God, exist in the same way and that each entity has a unique essence, called haecceity.[17] William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347 CE) proposed that one can decide between competing ontological theories by assessing which one uses the smallest number of elements, a principle known as Ockham's razor.[18]
In Arabic-Persian philosophy, Avicenna (980–1037 CE) combined ontology with theology. He identified God as a necessary being that is the source of everything else, which only has contingent existence.[19] In 8th-century Indian philosophy, the school of Advaita Vedanta emerged. It says that only a single all-encompassing entity exists, stating that the impression of a plurality of distinct entities is an illusion.[20] Starting in the 13th century CE, the Navya-Nyāya school built on Vaisheshika ontology with a particular focus on the problem of non-existence and negation.[21] 9th-century China saw the emergence of Neo-Confucianism, which developed the idea that a rational principle, known as li, is the ground of being and order of the cosmos.[22]
René Descartes (1596–1650) formulated a dualist ontology at the beginning of the modern period. It distinguishes between mind and matter as distinct substances that causally interact.[23] Rejecting Descartes's dualism, Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677) proposed a monist ontology according to which there is only a single entity that is identical to God and nature.[24] Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716), by contrast, said that the universe is made up of a great number of simple substances, which are synchronized but do not interact with one another.[25] John Locke (1632–1704) proposed his substratum theory, which says that each object has a featureless substratum that supports the object's properties.[26] Christian Wolff (1679–1754) was influential in establishing ontology as a distinct discipline, delimiting its scope from other forms of metaphysical inquiry.[27] George Berkeley (1685–1753) developed an idealist ontology according to which material objects are ideas perceived by minds.[28]
Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) rejected the idea that humans can have direct knowledge of independently existing things and their nature, limiting knowledge to the field of appearances. For Kant, ontology does not study external things but provides a system of pure concepts of understanding.[29] Influenced by Kant's philosophy, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831) linked ontology and logic. He said that being and thought are identical and examined their foundational structures.[30] Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) rejected Hegel's philosophy and proposed that the world is an expression of a blind and irrational will.[31] Francis Herbert Bradley (1846–1924) saw absolute spirit as the ultimate and all-encompassing reality[32] while denying that there are any external relations.[33]
At the beginning of the 20th century, Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) developed phenomenology and employed its method, the description of experience, to address ontological problems.[34] This idea inspired his student Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) to clarify the meaning of being in an approach he termed fundamental ontology.[35] Jean-Paul Sartre responded to Heidegger's philosophy by exploring the relation between being and nothingness from the perspective of human existence, freedom, and consciousness.[36] Based on the phenomenological method, Nicolai Hartmann (1882–1950) developed a complex hierarchical ontology that divides reality into four levels: inanimate, biological, psychological, and spiritual.[37]
Alexius Meinong (1853–1920) articulated a controversial ontological theory that includes nonexistent objects as part of reality.[38] Arguing against this theory, Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) formulated a fact ontology known as logical atomism. This idea was further refined by the early Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) and inspired D. M. Armstrong's (1926–2014) ontology.[39] Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947), by contrast, developed a process ontology.[40] Rudolf Carnap (1891–1970) questioned the objectivity of ontological theories by claiming that what exists depends on one's linguistic framework.[41] He had a strong influence on Willard Van Orman Quine (1908–2000), who analyzed the ontological commitments of scientific theories to solve ontological problems.[42] Quine's student David Lewis (1941–2001) formulated the position of modal realism, which says that possible worlds are as real and concrete as the actual world.[43] Starting at the end of the 20th century, interest in applied ontology has risen in computer and information science with the development of conceptual frameworks for specific domains.[44]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Its initial ideas were developed in the 7th and 6th centuries BCE but it was not until 350 CE that it received its classical and systematic formulation.[2]
- ^ The founding text of the school was written 500–300 BCE and the first major commentary on it is dated 400 CE.[4]
- ^ The exact date is disputed and some theorist suggest a later date between the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE.[6]
Citations
[edit]- ^
- Baird 2017, p. 5
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- ^
- Ruzsa, Lead Section
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- ^
- Lopez 2010, p. 1426
- Ruzsa, Lead Section
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- ^ Lopez 2010, p. 1426
- ^
- Ambuel 1998, § 1. Categories
- Lopez 2010, p. 1426
- ^
- Dynes 2016, p. 60
- Littlejohn, § 2. Classical Sources for Our Understanding of Daoism
- ^
- Littlejohn, § 5. Fundamental Concepts in the Daodejing
- Dynes 2016, pp. 60–61
- ^
- ^
- Graham, § 1. Presocratic Thought
- Rée & Urmson 2004, pp. 308–309
- ^
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 184–185
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 590
- Graham, § 3b. Metaphysics
- ^
- Thomasson 2022, § 1.1 Aristotelian Realism
- Studtmann 2024, § 2. The Ten-Fold Division
- Wardy 1998, § 1. Categories in Aristotle
- ^
- Halfwassen 2014, p. 185
- Hancock 2006, pp. 187–188
- Hamlyn 2005, pp. 590–591
- Graham, § 5. Post-Hellenistic Thought
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 188–189
- Grayling 2019, § Boethius, § Abelard
- Marenbon 2009, p. 6
- Sweeney 2016, pp. 10–11
- ^
- Buren 2023, p. 53
- Hancock 2006, p. 189
- ^
- Aertsen 2009, p. 117
- Goris & Aertsen 2019, § 4.1 The first model: God as the cause of transcendental being (Thomas Aquinas)
- Kuhlmann 2010, p. 1859
- ^
- Gilson 2018, § 1C Common Being, § 6C Unity of the Concrete
- Williams 2022, § 2.3 Divine Infinity and the Doctrine of Univocity, § 3.3 Universals and Individuation
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 190
- Grayling 2019, § Ockham
- Kuhlmann 2010, p. 1859b
- ^ Lizzini 2021, § 2.1 Ontology and Theology, § 2.4 Univocacy of Being and Ontological Distinction
- ^
- Grayling 2019, § Indian Philosophy
- Perrett 2016, § The Medieval Period of Indian Philosophy
- Dalal 2021, Lead Section, § 2.3 Two-Tiered Reality
- ^
- Ambuel 1998, § 10. Nonexistence or absence
- Bhattacharya 2013, p. 35
- ^
- Berthrong, Lead Section, § 4. Traits, Themes and Motifs
- Wu 2022, p. 56
- Smart 2008, p. 99
- ^
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 591
- Dehsen 2013, p. 51
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 190
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 591
- ^
- Hancock 2006, pp. 190–191
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 591
- Look 2020, § 4. Metaphysics: A Primer on Substance
- Menzel 2023, 1. Possible Worlds and Modal Logic
- ^
- Robinson & Weir 2024, § 2.5.1 Locke on 'pure substance in general'
- Kuhlmann 2010, p. 1860b
- ^
- Svare 2006, p. 15
- Hettche & Dyck 2019, § 5. Metaphysics
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 192
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 591
- ^
- Lorini 2015, pp. 71, 75–76
- Grier 2022, § 1. Preliminary Remarks: The Rejection of Ontology (general metaphysics) and the Transcendental Analytic
- ^
- Redding 2020, § 3.1.2 Science of Logic
- Houlgate 2006, p. 117
- ^
- Grayling 2019, § Schopenhauer
- Janaway 1999, pp. 248–249
- ^
- Hancock 2006, p. 193
- Hamlyn 2005, p. 592
- Grayling 2019, § Idealism
- ^ Johansson 2014, p. 226
- ^ Boedeker 2008, p. 156
- ^
- Wheeler 2020, § 2.2.1 The Question
- Schalow 2019, p. 139
- ^ Onof, Lead Section
- ^
- Poli 2011, pp. 1, 11, 21–22
- Peterson & Poli 2022, § 3. What is the Relationship between Thinking and Being?, § 5.2 Strata
- ^ Aspenson 2016, § 1.4 Essential Terms of Metaphysics: Ontology
- ^
- Proops 2022, Lead Section
- Klement 2019, Lead Section
- Mumford 2003, p. 100
- Loux & Crisp 2017, p. 148
- ^
- Desmet & Irvine 2022, § 6. Metaphysics
- Palmer 1998, p. 175
- ^
- Chalmers 2009, p. 78
- Hofweber 2023, § 4.4 Carnap’s rejection of ontology. (L1) meets (O4) and (the end of?) (O2)
- ^
- Ney 2014, pp. 37–38, 40
- van Inwagen, Sullivan & Bernstein 2023, § 4. The Methodology of Metaphysics
- ^ Parent, § 2. Lewis' Realism
- ^
- Guizzardi 2007, pp. 18–19
- Sales & Guizzardi 2017, p. 28
Sources
[edit]- Sales, Tiago Prince; Guizzardi, Giancarlo (2017). "'Is It a Fleet or a Collection of Ships?': Ontological Anti-patterns in the Modeling of Part-Whole Relations". In Kirikova, Mārīte; Nørvåg, Kjetil; Papadopoulos, George A. (eds.). Advances in Databases and Information Systems: 21st European Conference, ADBIS 2017, Nicosia, Cyprus, September 24-27, 2017, Proceedings. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-66917-5.
- Guizzardi, Giancarlo (2007). "On Ontology, Ontologies, Conceptualizations, Modeling Langauges, and (Meta)Models". In Vasilecas, Olegas; Eder, Johann; Caplinskas, Albertas (eds.). Databases and Information Systems IV: Selected Papers from the Seventh International Baltic Conference, DB&IS'2006. IOS Press. ISBN 978-1-58603-715-4.
- Poli, Roberto (2011). "Hartmann's Theory of Categories: Introductory Remarks". In Poli, Roberto; Scognamiglio, Carlo; Tremblay, Frederic (eds.). The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-025418-1.
- Peterson, Keith; Poli, Roberto (2022). "Nicolai Hartmann". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
- Onof, Christian J. "Sartre, Jean Paul: Existentialism". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
- Boedeker, Edgar C. (2008). "Phenomenology". In Dreyfus, Hubert L.; Wrathall, Mark A. (eds.). A Companion to Heidegger. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-99724-6.
- Johansson, Ingvar (2014). "All Relations are Internal: The New Version". In Reboul, Anne (ed.). Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan - Volume 1. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-04199-5.
- Bhattacharya, Kamaleswar (2013). "On Two Questions of the New Logic of India". In Schumann, Andrew (ed.). Logic in Religious Discourse. Ontos Verlag. ISBN 978-3-11-031957-6.
- Kuhlmann, Meinard (2010). "Ontologie". In Sandkühler, Hans Jörg (ed.). Enzyklopädie Philosophie (2 ed.). Meiner. ISBN 978-3-7873-1999-2.
- Williams, Thomas (2022). "John Duns Scotus". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
- Gilson, Etienne (2018). John Duns Scotus: Introduction to His Fundamental Positions. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-0-567-67870-6.
- Buren, Franziska van (2023). Aristotle and the Ontology of St. Bonaventure. Leuven University Press. ISBN 978-94-6270-356-8.
- Rée, Jonathan; Urmson, J. O. (30 September 2004). The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-33177-2. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- Aspenson, Steven Scott (2016). The Philosopher's Tool Kit. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-315-29291-5.
- Houlgate, Stephen (2006). The Opening of Hegel's Logic: From Being to Infinity. Purdue University Press. ISBN 978-1-55753-256-5.
- Redding, Paul (2020). "Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 24 June 2024.
- Lorini, Gualtiero (2015). "Kant's Metaphor by Analogy between Ontology and Transcendental Philosophy". In Kauark-Leite, Patricia; Cecchinato, Giorgia; Figueiredo, Virginia De Araujo; Ruffing, Margit; Serra, Alice (eds.). Kant and the Metaphors of Reason. Georg Olms Verlag. ISBN 978-3-487-15124-3.
- Lizzini, Olga (2021). "Ibn Sina's Metaphysics". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 23 June 2024.
- Goris, Wouter; Aertsen, Jan (2019). "Medieval Theories of Transcendentals". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
- Aertsen, Jan A. (2009). "Aquinas, St. Thomas". In Kim, Jaekwon; Sosa, Ernest; Rosenkrantz, Gary S. (eds.). A Companion to Metaphysics. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-5298-3.
- Halfwassen, Jens (2014). "The Metaphysics of the One". In Slaveva-Griffin, Svetla; Remes, Pauliina (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-59136-8.
- Lopez, Carlos (2010). "India, Hinduism in: Medieval Period". In Melton, J. Gordon; Baumann, Martin (eds.). Religions of the World: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-59884-204-3.
- Ambuel, David (1998). "Ontology in Indian philosophy". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-F063-1. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
- Graham, Jacob. "Presocratics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 21 June 2024.
- Kahn, Charles H. (2009). Essays on Being. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-156006-4.
- Baird, Forrest (2017). Philosophic Classics: Asian Philosophy, Volume VI. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-351-21745-3.
- Grier, Michelle (2022). "Kant's Critique of Metaphysics". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
- Grayling, A. C. (2019). The History of Philosophy. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-0-241-98086-6. Archived from the original on 3 July 2023. Retrieved 30 June 2023.
- Ruzsa, Ferenc. "Sankhya". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 19 May 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
- Dynes, Wayne R. (2016). "Creation of Daoism (6th Century BC)". In Curta, Florin; Holt, Andrew (eds.). Great Events in Religion: An Encyclopedia of Pivotal Events in Religious History [3 Volumes]. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-61069-566-4. Archived from the original on 30 March 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- Littlejohn, Ronnie. "Daoist Philosophy". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 29 March 2024. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
- Chai, David (2020). Dao Companion to Xuanxue 玄學 (Neo-Daoism). Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-49228-1. Archived from the original on 2 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- Robinet, Isabelle (2013). "Chongxuan". In Pregadio, Fabrizio (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Taoism: 2-volume Set. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-79634-1. Archived from the original on 2 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- Hancock, Roger (2006). "Metaphysics, History of". In Borchert, Donald M. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 6: Masaryk – Nussbaum (2 ed.). Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference. ISBN 978-0-02-865786-8.
- Hamlyn, D. W. (2005). "Metaphysics, History of". The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926479-7.
- Thomasson, Amie (2022). "Categories". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 8 October 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
- Studtmann, Paul (2024). "Aristotle's Categories". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 22 March 2024.
- Wardy, Robert (1998). "Categories". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-N005-1. ISBN 978-0-415-25069-6. Archived from the original on 22 March 2024. Retrieved 22 March 2024.
- Marenbon, John (2009). "Introduction: Reading Boethius Whole". In Marenbon, John (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-82815-4. Archived from the original on 2 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- Sweeney, E. (2016). Logic, Theology and Poetry in Boethius, Anselm, Abelard, and Alan of Lille: Words in the Absence of Things. Springer. ISBN 978-1-137-06373-1. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 17 June 2023.
- Perrett, Roy W. (2016). An Introduction to Indian Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85356-9. Archived from the original on 9 June 2023. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- Dalal, Neil (2021). "Śaṅkara". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 27 January 2022. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Berthrong, John H. "Neo-Confucian Philosophy". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 6 February 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
- Wu, Guo (2022). An Anthropological Inquiry Into Confucianism: Ritual, Emotion, and Rational Principle. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-7936-5432-8. Archived from the original on 4 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- Smart, Ninian (2008). World Philosophies (2 ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-41188-2.
- Dehsen, Christian von (2013). Philosophers and Religious Leaders. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-95102-3. Archived from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 28 May 2023.
- Look, Brandon C. (2020). "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Menzel, Christopher (2023). "Possible Worlds". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
- Svare, Helge (2006). Body and Practice in Kant. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4020-4118-1. Archived from the original on 2 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- Hettche, Matt; Dyck, Corey (2019). "Christian Wolff". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 8 August 2019. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Janaway, Christopher (1999). "10. The Primacy of Will". Self and World in Schopenhauer's Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-825003-6. Archived from the original on 2 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- Proops, Ian (2022). "Wittgenstein's Logical Atomism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Klement, Kevin (2019). "Russell's Logical Atomism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 11 April 2024. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- Mumford, Stephen, ed. (2003). "11. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism". Russell on Metaphysics: Selections from the Writings of Bertrand Russell. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-90272-7. Archived from the original on 2 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- Desmet, Ronald; Irvine, Andrew David (2022). "Alfred North Whitehead". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
- Palmer, Clare (1998). Environmental Ethics and Process Thinking. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-826952-6. Archived from the original on 2 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.