User talk:SteveofCaley

Hello! I'm posting in interest about certain issues in Japan, and welcome your feedback! Steve

Welcome!

Hello, SteveofCaley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Yeu Ninje 08:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japan Review[edit]

Thanks! I assume you mean Kanagawa Shinbun? I really wish I could add more info to the article, but seeing as the paper barely has its own webpage I don't think it's possible. I was mainly worried about its move from shimbun to shinbun because there don't seem to be many articles that use the shinbun. I assume that your thanks means that's okay. =) — Indi ^{[ talk ]} 11:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Ooka Tadasuke[edit]

Nice job on the edits. I did a few more, and merged the stub from Ooka Echizen into the article. If you need any other assistance, feel free and let me know.--み使い Mitsukai 20:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I could be of assistance. If there's anything else I can do, please let me know.--み使い Mitsukai 13:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Warden Barbara Wagner[edit]

A tag has been placed on Warden Barbara Wagner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor 04:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Barbara Wagner (prison officer)[edit]

An editor has nominated Barbara Wagner (prison officer), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Wagner (prison officer) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Central New Mexico Correctional Facility[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Central New Mexico Correctional Facility, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-82489.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion[edit]

I just don't think I can keep up with the atmosphere of the place here. It's too confusing. --Steve (talk) 03:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's been many years, but, just keep in mind "put things in my own words" and it will avoid copyright infringement notices WhisperToMe (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On your speedy deletion request[edit]

You added the {{db-author}} tag to the Otter Creek Correctional Complex article — which indicates that a request by the article creator for deletion. The article history shows that you are not the article creator — rather it was created by User:W.marsh, thus the tag is incorrect.

If for some other reason, you feel that the article needs to be deleted, please review Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Thanks.

— ERcheck (talk) 04:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless and Unfriendly[edit]

This whole website seems to have become more pointless and unfriendly. Why bother? It's like everything elese in American Society - dense, bureaucratized, political, unfriendly.--Steve (talk) 08:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know.[edit]

No, I am a guest here. No, Wikipedia does not belong to me. Yes, if I don't like it, I can leave. I understand.--Steve (talk) 08:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Girly Chew[edit]

A tag has been placed on Girly Chew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot how much it sucks to submit here.--Steve (talk) 04:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

Hi, Steve! I caught this edit back in 2008

I don't mean to be nitpicky, but I realize this is a copyvio: http://www.cca.com/facility/san-diego-correctional-facility/ 2008 archive page: http://web.archive.org/web/20080112043607/http://www.correctionscorp.com/facility_detailed.cfm?facid=105 WhisperToMe (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On the deletion of Ladino[edit]

I am now a fan. I hope you don't mind my reprinting your "Preterite" talk post from 2013.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/john-hicks/reason-vs-wikipedia/10156745196177388/

Frappyjohn (talk) 07:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, SteveofCaley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]