User talk:Rsrikanth05: Difference between revisions

Hi, you reverted an edit on Pain & Gain as vandalism. Could you please check the source on the material you reverted? The text you put back is vandalism that snuck past and is not verifiable per WP:V. --2602:306:C473:CA10:70E2:4B04:A303:5711 (talk) 13:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:27, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you actually feel like having a discussion or being constructive, feel free to discuss it :) --Nyroska (talk) 08:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are the one edit warring, I'm bringing in an admin. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Shooting of Walter Scott

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Walter Scott. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

News and notes: "Inspire" grant-making campaign concludes, grantees announced

Featured content: The amorous android and the horsebreeder; WikiCup round two concludes

In the media: Guggenheim image donation; Wiki campaign gets advertising award

Special report: FDC candidates respond to key issues

Traffic report: The grim ship reality

Please comment on Talk:Ale Resnik

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ale Resnik. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

You don't need to punish ME because YOU have severe insecurities... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.165.237.13 (talk) 08:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh buzz off you vandal. You seem to be the one with the insecurities. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I will add it back again as it is true — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcknockiterp (talk • contribs) 14:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then be prepared to have it removed if it is not sourced. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's your deal

What's your deal? I'm not vandalizing anything I speak truth. I have never said anything negative ever? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youpostedthis (talk • contribs) 18:51, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

if it is the trusth, then where is the source? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey maybe you could help me out / point me in the right direction I have to put up a bunch of Wikipedia stuff for my company michigan drill I have all the patents, I don't know how I am supposed to cite/ Source them if you have a link or something that explains that would be awesome. Sorry about the earlier post. I didn't mean to mess anything up.

Perhaps it would be nice if you read the big bold message at the top of this page where I specifically ask for new messages to go at the bottom of the page. Anyway, to answer your question, creating an article for your company, so long as it is notable, all claims are verifiable, not written like an advert and is backed up by reliable sources. Please go thru the links I jus posted, it might help you out. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (US stations)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (US stations). Legobot (talk) 00:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i do not understand

It was an editing of a musical group. Record collectors have called there release " the holy grail" a signed copy was the highest selling release on eBay.they have been recognized world wide on sights such as spirit of metal, metal treasures, collectors frenzy. They are more note worthy than some band from sweden . You may not find it interesting but others do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leftshred (talk • contribs) 05:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Leftshred: Hi, if they are 'more notable', then why does the band NOT have an article? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:19, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see now .you are one of those people who do not have a life outside of the internet unlike people who co exist with others on a personal face to face level. Get a grip on your self .if you were not so quick to have a boring life and have the need to think you are in someway better than others there would be an article. Oh wait ...there will be one its called free speech you should be banned from using this sight

@@ Line 142: / Line 142: @@
 It was an editing of a musical group. Record collectors have called there release " the holy grail" a signed copy was the highest selling release on eBay.they have been recognized world wide on sights such as spirit of metal, metal treasures, collectors frenzy. They are more note worthy than some band from sweden . You may not find it interesting but others do.  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Leftshred|Leftshred]] ([[User talk:Leftshred|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Leftshred|contribs]]) 05:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :{{yo|Leftshred}} Hi, if they are 'more notable', then why does the band NOT have an article? --[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05#top|talk]]) 05:19, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
+Oh I see now .you are one of those people who do not have a life outside of the internet unlike people who co exist with others on a personal face to face level. Get a grip on your self .if you were not so quick to have a boring life and have the need to think you are in someway better than others there would be an article. Oh wait ...there will be one its called free speech you should be banned from using this sight