User talk:StaticGull

Welcome! Indications:

• “Sign” (~~~~) new messages — Unsigned messages will be reverted.

• Choose a headline for new messages ( == == ). New messages without headlines will be reverted.
• In order to keep discussions together and not to lose track it's important only to talk at one place:

• If I started a discussion on your talk page, please anwer there and not here.
• If you left me a message on my talk page (here), I'll answer here.
• Please use the {{Talkback|your username}} template to alert me of new responses; I'll do the same

• Please write new messages at the bottom of this page or use this link.

Thanks for paying attention to the preceding indications. :-).

StaticGull  Talk 

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello StaticGull! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 14 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Fleur Agema - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Martin Bosma - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Teun van Dijck - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

18:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi! If you've had the same IP address since the edit you made on Component Object Model, someone might have connected to your wireless router, or someone other than you might have accessed the internet. StaticGull  Talk  21:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

vandalism accusation

how is my edit vandalism? --83.128.115.179 (talk) 21:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi! You're right, and I've undone my edit. However, keep the 3RR rule in mind. StaticGull  Talk  21:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, can you also please remove the warning you put on my talk page and put something on my behalve there? Otherwise the next person looking at my talk page will think i'm a vandal again and revert me again even if it's not vandalism.--83.128.115.179 (talk) 21:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Done. I've also hidden your comment, so it doesn't appear as though you replied to the previous entry. Feel free to change this though. StaticGull  Talk  21:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Question

I promise I'm not trying to make trouble but I'm from Minnesota and the Citizens League page could stand to be expanded. What is a good way to go about this? Horusfitzfancy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horusfitzfancy (talk • contribs) 20:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Don't worry about making trouble, just be bold and someone will guide you if needed. Having seen the page about Sean Kershaw you created, I think it might not meet the WP:BIO guidelines. It might be a better idea to expand the Citizens League page itself, as it's only a stub. Don't forget to use reliable sources, so readers know what they're reading is the truth. Happy editing, and let me know if you need help with anything :-)! StaticGull  Talk  21:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hey

I've noticed some vandalism on Reaper Eternals talk page which I'm going to undo. It will take your recent message off as well. Is that ok? --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 23:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi! That's okay. StaticGull  Talk  15:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Glace_Bay,_Nova_Scotia addition.

Hello There, This is kind of odd for me, but I thought I would tell you that I did not put myself on Wikipedia on the Glace_Bay,_Nova_Scotia page. While it is true that I work for RIM and that I did in fact run for office, I am the first person to admit I am no where near the standard for a notable person and have removed such "attacks" in the past. I am mentioning this because it is a common tactic from some people who have edited other pages in the past to try to do that in hopes of discrediting me for when I revert their edits. It could very well be a well meaning supporter from my brief run for office but I really doubt it and if I found out who did that I would tell them not to add me to the list myself. Anyway I just wanted it on record it was not me, I never use anon IPs (I hate it when people do) and this is my real legit Wikipedia username (I know I maybe should have picked something different then my real name, but I try to act transparently when I edit so it seemed like the best fit). So to sum up, in the future it will not be me doing it and sorry if it was someone I know thinking I should be on there. I shouldn't. Thanks. -Kirkoconnell (talk) 23:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I'd like to apologise if my edit gave you that impression, I just suspected it was someone affiliated with your party. I appreciate your message! Keep up the good work! StaticGull  Talk  15:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

U stupid?

I warned the bot to not mess with me, so don't be a fucking retard and post on my page or I'll kick ur ass :P