User talk:احمد الليبي

Please mind your own business en don't be patronizing nor to try to increase the # of your contribution by editing this page using spam-like templates. احمد الليبي (talk) 05:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice - Balkans

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--slakr^\ talk / 04:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Widr (talk) 14:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GBIF distribution maps

Hi. You need to be aware that distribution maps in GBIF are not subject to any form of standardized quality control, and contain numerous data points that are erroneous, such as points representing terrestrial species but mapping in the middle of the ocean, or in polar regions. Please do not use GBIF maps as the basis for any edits in Wikipedia, they are not reliable sources as defined by Wikipedia policy. Thanks. Dyanega (talk) 15:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]