User talk:مجتبیٰ

Teamworks

Hi. Why did you remove the speedy deletion template from the promotional article Teamworks (now deleted)? Bishonen | talk 21:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen, hello. I think someone is using my account. I have to change my password as fast as i can. Thanks–– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 06:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I have to block this account, then. You don't even say you have changed your password, and how can I even tell your response came from the right person? Compromised accounts are blocked. I encourage you to create a new account, and to take good care of your new password. Have a read of WP:PASSWORD. Don't feel bad, happy editing! Bishonen | talk 08:14, 19 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen, but i changed my password right now! Please unblock again. Or allow me to edit my talkpage so that i can make unblock request.–– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 08:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Er.. what? You can edit your talkpage. You just did. Feel free to post an unblock request. Use the unblock template, as that will call an uninvolved admin to review the block. In other words, add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bishonen | talk 08:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

مجتبیٰ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason of my block is:My account is maybe used by another person. But now i changed my password. Please unblock me right now. For more disscussions see my talk page. Thanks.–– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 08:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Once an account has been compromised it can not be unblocked, as we have no way of knowing who is talking to us - the original owner or the hacker. You say below "And im really the owner of account", but anyone could say that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

مجتبیٰ, I've asked a question about this on WP:ANI, so I'm sure it'll be resolved soon. Bishonen | talk 08:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Atlan, but i changed my password. And im really the owner of account. –– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 09:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leps World for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leps World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leps World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolbasz (talk) 09:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

مجتبیٰ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im the true owner of this account. If i would not be the original owner of this account, why should i stick to it?? Plrase unblock me. I want to continue my contributions with this account. Now please unblock me, please.–– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 16:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Once an account has been compromised we cannot tell who is in control. It is better that you create a new account. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 17:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

–– مجتبیٰ  (Talk!) 16:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have a suggestion. I see you have made a number of contributions which have been deleted, so can you tell us something about what they were? As they have all been in the past 10 days, you should hopefully be able to remember at least one of them - and it's something a hacker won't know. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boing! said Zebedee, i rewiewed some articles, and made a template: {{Source needed message}}, in this template i displayed this text ⇣

" Hello! {‌{Pagename}‌}, you have to put some sources to your article {{{1}‌‌}‌}. Otherwise maybe someone tag your article for deletion. "

I only remember this. –– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 17:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And i think i removed two speedy deletion tags from newly created articles. –– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 17:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boing is of course welcome to make their own determination. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 17:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boing! said Zebedee, hello!

Yes! I created many userpages of different newusers. –– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 17:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that convinces me that you really are the original user of this account, so I will unblock you shortly - but before you do anything else, you should address Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mujtaba! and wait for the outcome. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conformed users

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Category:Conformed users, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 02:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]