User talk:محمد.رضا
February 2009
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maziar Zand, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Maziar Zand was changed by محمد.رضا (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-02-24T22:13:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I am editing in Wikipedia for a while, but not in the En wiki. That page was removed before and it is again restored by a user just by changing a letter into capital.--محمد.رضا (talk) 22:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
If you wish to nominate an article for Speedy Deletion, please do not remove the content of the article unless it is listed as a {{db-attack}}. In addition, please mark article only for valid reasons. See WP:Criteria for speedy deletion for more information. Just because an article was previously SD deleted does not mean it should be again deleted. The author could have made significant changes to the content that would have improved the material. Thanks...ttonyb1 (talk) 22:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
The only change is in title Zand -> zand. Nevertheless it still meets A7 criteria as before.--محمد.رضا (talk) 22:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- I too am uncomfortable about the notability of the article subject. Feel free to nominate for Speedy Deletion, but be aware the article does assert Notability by starting he is "award" winning. Again, I am not sure this "award" is enough to support Notability. This might have to go to AfD. ttonyb1 (talk) 23:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to list the article, I was about to do it. I have listed my observations in the AfD. ttonyb1 (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. --محمد.رضا (talk) 00:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to list the article, I was about to do it. I have listed my observations in the AfD. ttonyb1 (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)