Jump to content

User talk:মৌ মধুবন্তি

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 05:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, মৌ মধুবন্তি! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 05:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manonesh Das (December 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Manonesh Das, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, মৌ মধুবন্তি, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Persistent attempts to use Wikipedia for promotion

[edit]

This is one of a number of accounts which have been set up over a period of time with the single purpose of using Wikipedia to promote one person. Numerous pages have been created, all with substantially similar content, and most of them have been deleted as unsuitable for Wikipedia. The promotional material about this person is not going to be accepted as a Wikipedia article, so any time and effort you put into it will be wasted. If that were the only problem then it would simply be your own concern, but more important is the fact that you are also taking up the time of editors and administrators, who could make better use of that time on more constructive tasks. I don't know whether all the accounts have been operated by one person or by several people working for the same client, but it is clear that at least one other account has been operated either by you or by someone with whom you have collaborated. Using a string of new accounts to persistently try to push through a spam article which has repeatedly been rejected is abuse of multiple accounts. Also, the editing is clearly contrary to Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline, and almost certainly also in violation of the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use relating to paid editing. Any accounts which continue to do the same thing following this warning may be blocked from editing, without further notice. If you are not the person about whom you have been writing then I suggest you tell him about this message, so that he can avoid wasting further time and money on getting people to continue to try to spam him into Wikipedia. JBW (talk) 11:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mononesh Das (January 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Raydann were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]