User talk:-xfi-
Welcome!
Hello, -xfi-, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! (Bjorn Tipling 13:02, 10 December 2005 (UTC))
Speedy deletion
[edit]I noticed that you tagged the page Image:BCFlag.png for speedy deletion with the reason "This image is using only by User:Dschor. In articles about British Columbia provincial highways is template using SVG!". However, "This image is using only by User:Dschor. In articles about British Columbia provincial highways is template using SVG!" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:IFD if you still want the article to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle 20:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Is any problem to delete it now? ---xfi- 20:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see how Image:BCFlag.png meets the criteria for speedy deletion. If you could clarify this, it would be great. Stifle 20:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- I ask you: "Is any problem to delete it now?". There is no reason to have png, when on commons is SVG, png is duplicate. ---xfi- 20:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- This is not a reason to speedily delete it. Please read WP:CSD, particularly item 1 under "Images", where it says that an image being on Commons is not grounds for speedy deletion. You need to check out WP:IFD instead. Stifle 20:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Duplicate is reason, isn't it? ---xfi- 20:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Only if both images are on Wikipedia, not Commons and they are in the same file format. Stifle 20:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- "For speedy deletion candidates, use {{db|reason}}. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates, thumbnails, broken images, …" Here is not write: "Only if both images are on Wikipedia, not Commons and they are in the same file format." ---xfi- 20:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- You still did not read this page. Stifle 21:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Is it ok now? ---xfi- 21:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Please orphan it (remove it from every page that it is on) first. Stifle 21:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- It is also on:
- British Columbia provincial highway 19
- British Columbia provincial highway 19A
- British Columbia provincial highway 4
- British Columbia provincial highway 28
- British Columbia provincial highway 10
- British Columbia provincial highway 7
- British Columbia provincial highway 91
- British Columbia provincial highway 91A
- British Columbia provincial highway 15
- British Columbia provincial highway 1A
- British Columbia provincial highway 7A
- British Columbia provincial highway 13
- British Columbia provincial highway 7B
- British Columbia provincial highway 9
- British Columbia provincial highway 12
- British Columbia provincial highway 97
- British Columbia provincial highway 97A
- British Columbia provincial highway 5A
- British Columbia provincial highway 3A
- British Columbia provincial highway 3B
- British Columbia provincial highway 95
- British Columbia provincial highway 93
- British Columbia provincial highway 8
- British Columbia provincial highway 33
- British Columbia provincial highway 22
- British Columbia provincial highway 22A
- British Columbia provincial highway 41
- British Columbia provincial highway 395
- British Columbia provincial highway 21
- British Columbia provincial highway 6
- British Columbia provincial highway 23
- British Columbia provincial highway 43
- British Columbia provincial highway 24
- British Columbia provincial highway 26
- British Columbia provincial highway 35
- British Columbia provincial highway 27
- British Columbia provincial highway 39
- British Columbia provincial highway 29
- British Columbia provincial highway 52
- British Columbia provincial highway 77
- British Columbia provincial highway 49
- I will remove it from User:Dschor's page if you remove it from the others. Stifle 21:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Ok remove it from User:Dschor's page. ---xfi- 21:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have removed it and the image is now deleted under CSD:G7. Stifle 22:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Ok remove it from User:Dschor's page. ---xfi- 21:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- It is also on:
- Please orphan it (remove it from every page that it is on) first. Stifle 21:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Is it ok now? ---xfi- 21:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- You still did not read this page. Stifle 21:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- "For speedy deletion candidates, use {{db|reason}}. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates, thumbnails, broken images, …" Here is not write: "Only if both images are on Wikipedia, not Commons and they are in the same file format." ---xfi- 20:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Only if both images are on Wikipedia, not Commons and they are in the same file format. Stifle 20:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Duplicate is reason, isn't it? ---xfi- 20:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- This is not a reason to speedily delete it. Please read WP:CSD, particularly item 1 under "Images", where it says that an image being on Commons is not grounds for speedy deletion. You need to check out WP:IFD instead. Stifle 20:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- I ask you: "Is any problem to delete it now?". There is no reason to have png, when on commons is SVG, png is duplicate. ---xfi- 20:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see how Image:BCFlag.png meets the criteria for speedy deletion. If you could clarify this, it would be great. Stifle 20:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Flag of Switzerland
[edit]What was wrong with this flag Image:Flag of Switzerland.svg ver. 01:08, 23 March 2006? ---xfi- 09:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Nothing - I should've double-checked the PDF. ¦ Reisio 00:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Wikics template
[edit]Hi -xfi-! I've just created a new template to indicate English Wikipedia users who also contribute to the Czech Wikipedia.
Feel free to add it to your userboxes if you like it. Happy Easter. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 08:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
You are invited to join Wikipedia:Czech Wikipedian's notice board! The Czech notice board can be used for discussions on Czech-related topics; to plan your Czech-related projects; and ask for, or offer assistance for Czech-related subjects. Editors are encouraged to sign their nickname on the list of active participators. --Thus Spake Anittas 02:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Flag of Lewis
[edit]A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Flag of Lewis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MRM 20:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EAA-EMRC-2006.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:EAA-EMRC-2006.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Flag of Seattle.svg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Flag of Seattle.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Swiss flag
[edit]Hi. There are currently two different versions of the Swiss flag used across the English wikipedia, so I started a discussion at WT:CH#Swiss red to see if there is one better version that we could use consistently. In case you have any comment or suggestion (as a contributor to File:Flag of Switzerland.svg), you are welcome to join the discussion. mgeo talk 22:14, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, -xfi-. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, -xfi-. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, -xfi-. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)