User talk:08greenhornet

February 2008

Your recent edit to Kawasaki KLR650 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Kawasaki KLR650 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Kawasaki KLR650 are being reverted because the links you are inserting do not meet the standards of WP:EL. Snowfire51 (talk) 19:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, you are violating the wikipedia three revert policy. Please read the link, and do not violate the spirit of the rule by adding these links again in the next 24 hours. If you feel there's a legitimate case for adding them, and they do not violate WP:EL, please discuss it on the talk page for the article. Thanks! Snowfire51 (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Daedalus969 (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked as a sock of User:Guest2610. Please wait until the block on that account is over before you come back. Rettetast (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

08greenhornet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Autoblocked by loose-cannon administator I have been autoblocked and have tried to contact the issuing administrator however he does not have a valid e-mail address on his account.

Decline reason:

You were blocked (1) for spam and (2) for evading the block on your main account using a sockpuppet. Neither is permitted. — B (talk) 23:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

08greenhornet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Administrator is not being fair here. I did not intend to break any rules

Decline reason:

But you did. It's kind of hard to sockpuppet without really trying to. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

08greenhornet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was ACCUSED of spamming, why dont you investigate. I do-not spam. You are referring to useful contributions as spam.

Decline reason:

This account is clearly in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK, and you have been abusing the unblock template. — Yamla (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there... you have been blocked for being a sockpuppet, however the warnings above prove that you have been spamming. The Helpful One ^(Review) 18:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]