User talk:100.37.165.187

May 2020

Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shiney Ahuja, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 15:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

British English

Hi there, re: these changes, your efforts are appreciated, but please refrain from switching British English spelling to American English spelling. We typically use British English for articles related to India. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Thanoscar21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kaho Naa... Pyaar Hai, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 14:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kasthuri (actress), you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:34, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. S0091 (talk) 00:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Arvind Swami, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 05:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 19:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

100.37.165.187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think it's necessary for me to be unblocked because I understand what I have been blocked for and I will not add unsourced or poorly sourced content and instead, I will add content that is useful and sourced to any Wikipedia page.100.37.165.187 (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your user account is indefinitely blocked and you were advised to wait 6 months before making another unblock request. Logging out and making a similar request shows you aren't ready to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 16:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

100.37.165.187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think it's necessary for me to be unblocked because I understand what I have been blocked for and I will only add or edit content if I need to and it will be sourced and useful information in a way that it will not hurt or vandalize any Wikipedia pages.

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the block evasion at all. Sign in with your account and make your request there. Yamla (talk) 18:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: pretty sure you've spotted this, but this is AbhinavA1694. The history of Abitha where I reverted AbhinavA1694, a few days later .187 makes this edit to restore the unsourced DOB. The editor interaction is surprisingly large. The IP also made unsourced edits about movie titles coming from songs, which AbhinavA1694 did multiple times. Ravensfire (talk) 19:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nandha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 16:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added the word "thriller" in Thamizhan because it's truly a thriller film.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

100.37.165.187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I have been blocked for, because I realize my mistake and I will only add or change content if it is useful or sourced. Otherwise, I will leave the Wikipedia pages as is.

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the block evasion, and you should request unblock from your original account. 331dot (talk) 20:19, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

100.37.165.187 (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add a production section in Bewafaa and use this source for production:.^[1]

This is deeply inappropriate. Stop trying to use people to evade your block. Do that again and you'll lose access to this talk page and have your block reset. --Yamla (talk) 19:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How is it inappropriate?

YOU ARE BLOCKED. You are not allowed to edit. You are not allowed to get your friends to edit for you. You are not allowed to get strangers to edit for you. YOU ARE BLOCKED. If I see anything other than an acknowledgement of this from you, I will immediately restart your block and revoke access to this talk page. Think very carefully before making any further edit here. --Yamla (talk) 19:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you accept my unblock request, what color will it be?

Block restarted, talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 01:34, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

100.37.165.187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How was I evading my block? 100.37.165.187 (talk) 01:57, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You tell us. If your next edit does anything other than acknowledge that you were evading your block, or state that you will return to your account to request unblock, you will lose access to this page again. 331dot (talk) 08:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I truly don't have any connection to those accounts, and my account is globally locked so I can't request unblock there. 100.37.165.187 (talk) 13:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your account is locked, you are evading a global lock, and this block is appropriate as a result. Java Hurricane 13:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But the other accounts, Pcgmsrich, The3Kittens, and Freezeflame19, I don't have any connection to those accounts. 100.37.165.187 (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

100.37.165.187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think it's necessary for me to be unblocked because I understand what I have been blocked for and I will only add or edit content if I need to and it will be sourced and useful information in a way that it will not hurt or vandalize any Wikipedia pages. 100.37.165.187 (talk) 02:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Bzzzzt! You lose! And I won't thank you for playing because this wasn't a game to begin with. Yamla laid down two conditions; neither of which you met, in fact one could reasonably presume from your request that you hadn't even bothered to read that response. Talk page access revoked and I think a block extension may be in order as well. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK, the block is now two years, and ...

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://bestoftheyear.in/movie/bewafaa/

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[1] ttps://bestoftheyear.in/movie/bewafaa/

[1]