User talk:108.240.252.86

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Little Einsteins has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Little Einsteins was changed by 108.240.252.86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854634 on 2014-01-23T01:05:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hi, when you submit problematic content as you did here, and it gets reverted, please don't just resubmit it, as you did here, here and here. While you may disagree with the bot who reverted your edit as vandalism, I left a clear explanation for why *I* reverted your edit, and that was: "Intermediate edits from IP, while presumably well-intentioned, introduce unsourced ages and birthdates, as well as unfounded speculation." Check the article's edit history before reverting. I have restored portions of the content you submitted, but not all of it, because much of it was problematic for the reasons stated above. This is why you shouldn't plagiarize content by copy/pasting from one internet source to another. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:58, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Little Einsteins shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You have repeatedly re-added unsourced trivia and refused to discuss the issue. if you restore the material again without a reliable source or discussion on the talk page, you will be blocked from editing SummerPhD (talk) 03:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Admr Boltz 15:06, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.