User talk:110.150.20.32

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.150.20.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked for no reason, possibly an IP hack, never edited before and I can't create and account. But I would like to contribute here without being blocked for something I didn't do. Pinging @Barkeep49:, the blocking admin, for comment. I'm currently blocked for one year for the reason {{{CheckUser block}}} (whatever that is).

Decline reason:

Pings do not work unless you sign the same post in which you ping with four tildes(~~~~). A checkuser has access to private technical logs that even admins don't have access to. A checkuser block means that technical evidence supports it and only a checkuser may remove it. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Barkeep49: please unblock me this is a shared IP that may have been hacked. I did nothing wrong. Thanks. 110.150.20.32 (talk) 08:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made this block as part of our privacy efforts to prevent named accounts from being linked to an IP address. I am checking with the CheckUser who performed this investigation for more information. But the bottomline is that this IP has been used by someone(s) to create multiple accounts which have violated Wikipedia policies and guidelines, including about WP:SOCKING. Barkeep49 (talk) 13:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have talked to the investigating checkuser and was able to confirm their findings myself. The technical evidence linking you to accounts that were violating our socking policy is very strong. As 331dot indicated you are not able to appeal using the normal methods. If you would like to appeal this decision you may do so to the Arbitration Committee. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The arbitration community has received emails from me before, they don't care. The automatically just say "no, shut up and email again in six months". I don't care about "technical evidence", I'm not a sock. I know you'll just shut me down, because this is Wokepedia, but please take this into genuine consideration and make sure I don't get this blocking abuse and cyberbullying again. 110.150.20.32 (talk) 07:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested an account and when that account is created I expect to be not abused and bullied by admins, stewards or checkusers. I can legally sue Wikipedia for defamation, you know. But for now, an IP unblock would be nice. @Barkeep49: @331dot: 110.150.20.32 (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.