User talk:111.125.111.153

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dolphy, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Just adding "{Good article}" to an article is not the way we assess articles. Please read WP:GAN and WP:FA for more information. Further, your addition of unsourced honorifics and your refusal to use edit summaries is impolite at best. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 20:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop adding spurious "Good Article" banners. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. What are your sources for your addition of honorific-prefix = [[Excellency|His Excellency]] to dozens of infoboxes? How do you know, for example, what the protocol for Mongolia is? Same for India, Philippines, Paraguay, etc. Where are you getting this? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 03:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jeff Lynne, you may be blocked from editing. Egghead06 (talk) 05:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello! I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions has been undone because it added the Good Article template to George Lazenby, an article that has not been promoted by the Good Article Nomination process. If you believe that this article meets the Good Article Criteria, then you are encouraged to nominate it for review by following the Good Article nominating instructions. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Good Article Nominations talk page. Thank you. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

---