User talk:130.204.220.91

November 2018

Hello, I'm Jingiby. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jingiby (talk) 18:23, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

really you edited out the Article about Vasil Levski what i said is is written in the history books that we use in school how can you say it "seemed less than neutral" . Are you a Bulgarian ? what is your reasoning for this action how was the information not neutral it was just what happened there was no insults or any kind of slandering. Why ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Resonedecoy (talk • contribs) 08:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

can we have a conversation or are you going to just keep deleting my edits and throw accusations with links to somewhat vague explanations what are reliable sources to you does a reference from the official encyclopedia Britanica count or even better textbooks on Bulgarian history ? do you have an education in Bulgarian history to know that what i'm referencing is original research or so called "Synthesis of published material" because I do, and I can see you're confused for some reason can please moderate and give a real explanation what is wrong with the information and sources because if you continue ti just make accusations without explanations otherwise this will continue and I may have to report you to the Bulgarian national institute and museum of archaeology for deliberately withholding valuable information for understanding the severity of the situation in that time period I really don't want to do this but I also don't want to see a watered down history if my country missing key points which have significant meaning for the actions of individual to which the wikipedia page is dedicated to. I sincerely hope you understand so that we can have a discussion to clarify the matter and reach a solution.

best wishes from a Bulgarian

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. 11:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

disruptions of what vague and unclear terms that just say "it was bad" that doesn't make a historic reference to a very important problematic period in Bulgarian history and how em I drawing opposition towards what the ottoman empire is long gone what is there to draw opposition against can you please explain what part of my edit was disruptive and draws opposition i would like to avoid a dispute resolution because I think we can clarify this so what is your reasoning behind removing my edits if you think it's disruptive why is it so ? if you think it's drawing opposition why is it ?

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, 130.204.220.91, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

well it not about thinking or forcing opinion it's about the truth and clarity on a matter and since the moderator refuses to engage in conversations all i can do is edit so unless some one start talking with me so that we can resolve an issue it's going to continue like this. sorry Jingiby who ever you are I have rote and asked for a conversations multiple times you just send me copy pasted accusations and no conversation ensues when I ask why. until a conversation is achieved otherwise to me it just seems like you're abusing the system and your status as a moderator just to delete my posts

The conversation is going on the talk page of the article. If you have WP:RS supporting your forum-like edits, please provide them there. Also keep in mind, Wikipedia is not a forum. It is based on proofs, not on personal beliefs. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

the information is from official textbooks we use in Bulgarian schools I can provide the names and information of the books and I also gave links to Wikipedia pages on the things I edited otherwise I'm not sure what is considered a "reliable source" in historical context and if "forum-like" edits are a problem just give me a link to the page on which I'm supposed to write to you about the article I haven't done much edits over the years but this is the first time I have some sort of dispute about and edit so I'm sorry I'm not responding on the correct page, forum or chat but you didn't really give a "human-like" response until now and it was confusing because I thought you're a bot the first 2-3 times you wrote to me

---