|To keep both sides of a discussion together, if you leave me a message here then I will reply here. If I post a note on your talk page, please reply there.|
|Threads older than 60 days may be archived by.|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- Special report: Taking stock of the Good Article backlog
- News and notes: Arbitration Committee elections commence
- Traffic report: President-elect Trump
- Featured content: Featured mix
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- Year in review: Looking back on Wikimedia's 2016
- Special report: German Wikipedia ArbCom implodes amid revelation of member's far-right political role
- Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues
- Featured content: The Christmas edition
- Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results
- Recent research: One study and several abstracts
Oak Island Light
Re your recent overall edit of the subject page, I, like you, have concerns about the text/graphic formatting. I was not happy with my last editing of the page but my solution is a long run one, i.e., replace/reformat/resize/relocate the imagery on the page rather than eliminate it. So I think your removal of some images was premature. It may have to be done but I am trying to get more appropriate photos with permission which is not easy. So much for this concern.
Re the text edit of the subject page, I was appalled to say the least. Here are two selections that do not meet my standards: 1. Being completed in 1958, the Oak Island Light is one of the newest lighthouses in the United States. When completed the Oak Island Light replaced the Cape Fear Lighthouse, a steel skeleton structure on Bald Head Island, which was demolished later in 1958. My view is this is awkward, repetitive (completed-we all know that it was indeed finished)) and poorly phrased. 2. The main structure is anchored by 24 pilings 67’ deep (10" round and filled with concrete), the overall structure is 153’ tall with 148’ of that above grade. My view on this is not only missing necessary punctuation, it is also repetitive (structure).
And finally, your interpretation of editing needs re references differs from mine. For example, the section on visitation: A minimum of two weeks advance notice is normally required to obtain a tour reservation, which can be obtained on-line by visiting the Oak Island Lighthouse web site. took out the direct reference to the referenced web site. Its inclusion in the existing version was at the direct request of the FOIL Board which did not want any confusion as to where to go. In my next edit I will reference it rather than directly cite it but it will ensure that the reader gets to the so-called Official OI Lighthouse site.
While I am somewhat of a rookie in this world, I am a veteran writer and more importantly, try hard. Thus I would be happy to correspond with you directly on this matter (email@example.com), or it you prefer, I do have a user page, Regards. Frank Bausch. Francisbausch (talk) 18:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Christopher R. W. Nevinson
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Christopher R. W. Nevinson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 21:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
- Recent research: Female Wikipedians aren't more likely to edit women biographies; Black Lives Matter in Wikipedia