User talk:171.76.81.225

April 2023

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:2020 Delhi riots that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

We can't correct the wrong or bad aspects of history here, we can only go forward and collaborate in a civil manner. If you have specific concerns about the article, please make them without personal attacks and engage with us in a collaborative manner. I keep an open mind, try doing so yourself. 331dot (talk) 19:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

You however can use your white privilege to keep manipulating History to give yourself a clean chit. You live on lands illegally occupied on the basis of a Bigoted Doctrine of Discovery and suppressed Natives for Centuries and now claim to be the Shining Knights of everything Fair and Just to use it as a tool for Neo Colonialism. 171.76.81.225 (talk) 08:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

As I said, we can't go back in time and correct all the bad things that have happened in the past. We can choose to live in hatred, or we can civilly figure out how to move forward. If you choose to carry hatred, racism, and excessive nationalism here, you will find yourself quickly blocked. If you are interested in collaboration with us, to figure out how to best summarize independent reliable sources, please do without attacks. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

I carry neither hatred nor extreme nationalism. All I want is a simple edits based on RSNs quoted which you have unilaterally dismissed as biased due to government interference. There is nothing historical about this except for the typical sterootypical holier than tho attitude that your power to block and Moderator gives you unlimited power over this domain to do as you please according to your own whims and fancies while everyone else is here to play by rules you've decided but don't seem to apply to you.The Next edit Request from a valid RSN that you block will be treated as a violation of NPOV and acting in good faith and I'll take to every necessary platform inside and outside Wikipedia to expose your Bias and double standards. So if you still want to be the Colonial Overlord who whips the peasants who dare speak up, do so but you are neither so high or mighty as you seem to project yourself to be. 171.76.82.220 (talk) 17:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

I won't engage with you further until you cease making personal attacks. If you have evidence that Western governments are pressuring Western media to adopt an anti-India or an anti-Hindu stance, please offer it. I've offered evidence that the Indian government is pressuring its media to report its preferred narrative, along with India's generally poor record of press freedom(reading about The Emergency (India) was interesting). I have no problem having an open mind and hearing other posts of view. This also isn't about me, but Wikipedia policies. But the attacks and name calling must stop. I don't claim to be high and mighty. I'm just a man. If you want to have a civil discussion, I'm happy to. Doesn't seem like it, though. Good day. 331dot (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Why don't you read this? How USA is trying to weaponize Social media. I wouldn't be surprised if one day it is revealed Wikipedia is on top of their list https://missouriindependent.com/2023/03/30/u-s-house-members-battle-over-weaponization-of-government-in-hearing-on-missouri-lawsuit/

https://theconversation.com/amp/the-weaponization-of-the-federal-government-has-a-long-history-197848

USA armed Pakistan and kept mum on the Genocide of East Pakistan and even sent the 7th fleet to invade India on the pretext of helping Pakistan Task Force 74 USA has shown a history of Anti India Bias especially when a Democrat is in the White House. So wikipedia is clearly just a propaganda tool for the Neo Colonialism ambitions of USA. China has already blocked a lot of these American tools.List of websites blocked in mainland China I could go on but it is very likely that you will be pressurized by IRS like Matt Taibbi is currently being legally terrorized by the US government for exposing how US government intervenes in the affairs of Twitter https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/substack-writer-matt-taibbi-says-irs-visited-home-while-testifying-congress-cruz-musk-weigh-in.amp 171.76.85.40 (talk) 04:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Allegations from US Republicans in a partisan hearing and with partisan lawsuits are not evidence. If their lawsuit is successful and includes direct evidence or a direct determination that the US government is pressuring US news outlets to adopt an anti-India or anti-Hindu stance(not something more general), I will post it myself.

It's pretty clear your anti-US bias is clouding how you operate here. You don't have to like the US, you can hate us all you wish, but if your views on the US prevent you from working with us, you should find somewhere else to spend your time where you can stay stuck in the past and criticize what you term "neo colonialism" all you wish. I pay my taxes and don't itemize so I don't expect to see the IRS. 331dot (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

The article about the riot will not be whitewashed to provide the position or viewpoint of the Indian government, and characterize the riot as it wishes. Their viewpoint can be provided, characterized as its viewpoint and not that of independent reliable sources. If you are interested in doing that, make a proposal on the article talk page. 331dot (talk) 12:31, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

That's what these so called Gold standard RSNs you seem to worship fed your country about Vietnam,Iraq, Afghanistan,Russia and Ukraine. If you think anything that does not contradict Rocky,Rambo and Chuck Norris movies are the gold standard of Truth, you are free to follow it and I understand, Anyone would be terrified of legally terrorized by the American Agencies after reading about Matt Taibbi, Aaron Swartz, Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange. The price of speaking the truth and not toeing the agenda of the government in USA has always been severe. Even ex Presidents are not safe from the current despotic government which is working overtime to protect a criminal son of the President while preaching Liberalism on one side and on the other, Muzzles everyone who questions them. 171.76.85.40 (talk) 17:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

This isn't the forum to debate US politics or criticize the prosecution of alleged criminals(or lack thereof). You need to do that somewhere else. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 331dot (talk) 10:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

331dot (talk) 09:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

---