User talk:1713hild

April 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Third-wave feminism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Third-wave feminism was changed by 1713hild (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948869 on 2018-04-20T16:57:26+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Third-wave feminism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 17:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Third-wave feminism. Home Lander (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1713hild (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

simple missunderstanding of the rules, and stuff 1713hild (talk) 23:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to be trying to misuse Wikipedia as a soapbox for your views on feminism. Wikipedia isn't an internet forum for griping. Acroterion (talk) 23:47, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My edit creates Nutrality[edit]

My changes, correct left leaning statements, changing them to a nuetral point of view. Infact, heres the part of the guideline, that my edit defends:

guideline segment[edit]

Avoid stating opinions as facts. Usually, articles will contain information about the significant opinions that have been expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in Wikipedia's voice.1713hild (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And this [1] is something that needed to be said in Wikipedia's voice? Acroterion (talk) 22:38, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You miss-understand the point[edit]

The point is, some of them create problems,as do all groups of people, but not all of them are that way. Thus the word rouge. Also, what I stated was not biased to either side. 1713hild (talk) 23:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, the word "rouge" doesn't mean what you apparently think it does. In any case, I agree with Daniel Case - you appear to be using Wikipedia as a way of airing grievances, which isn't what the encyclopedia is about. Acroterion (talk) 23:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accept, my intentions were not to vandalize, or break any rules.[edit]

My intentions were to point out recent events. 1713hild (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...Which you did in a biased way without establishing any sort of consensus, and ignored warnings to stop.💵Money💵emoji💵^Talk 23:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How is it biased?[edit]

Could it possibly be the way I worded things? (Im not the best when it comes to typing)

1713hild (talk) 23:53, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits like this and this are clearly you inserting your own opinion. You should insert less commentary on a subject if you want to continue to edit. If you want to get unblocked, I recommend acknowledging your mistakes and make a genuine commitment to not making similar edits again.💵Money💵emoji💵^Talk 23:59, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just righting what I"ve been told.[edit]

If theres bias in that, blame the media not me. However, I apologize for anything I have written, that may not follow the guidelines. 1713hild (talk) 04:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]