User talk:173.87.170.14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2021[edit]

Blue warning icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Irene Byon. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6oTIjvw_-8 173.87.170.14 (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination has been reverted.
Your edit here to Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6oTIjvw_-8) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  clpo13(talk) 03:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2022[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. CiphriusKane (talk) 03:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

A page you created has been deleted as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.87.170.14 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

if this is because of the Draft:Veracity of statements by Joe Biden draft article, then it hardly seems fair to call it an attack page when Veracity of statements by Donald Trump is sitting in mainspace now. if this is regarding me calling him a 'walking skeleton' in early revisions of the draft article, i did remove those remarks after thinking better of it. if it's something else, plz lmk. 173.87.170.14 (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't seem to understand the requirements under WP:BLP and should refrain from any editing, even once your block has expired, until you thoroughly understand that policy. Yamla (talk) 20:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually, it goes far beyond even WP:BLP. The page you created had absolutely no place on an encyclopedia. Perhaps you'll be happier on another site, because Wikipedia isn't the place for this garbage. --Yamla (talk) 20:18, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okey doodle. see u in a week. :^) 173.87.170.14 (talk) 22:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 00:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
i can get a new IP by rebooting my router. you should rangeblock me imo. :^) 173.87.170.14 (talk) 22:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]