User talk:179.50.174.57

Enough

I'm tired of you changing the infobox for David Parker Ray. If you actually take the time to read the article, he had ZERO murder convictions, his crimes were only torture charges. There have been multiple IP addresses that have done this and I have no doubt they are all you. Do not make edits to Wikipedia if you can't interpret what the content present in the article is. Wikipedia is not for trolling and edit warring is something we don't allow. YatesTucker00090 (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Did you seriously not listen, STOP. YatesTucker00090 (talk) 04:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Why do keep editing the infobox when you have not read the article? if you're doing this for trolling or to frustrate people, then you should not be on wikipedia. YatesTucker00090 (talk) 04:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Enough part 2

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Rising5554 (talk) 13:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Relating to the section above, please read WP:BLPCRIME. You have violated this on numerous occasions, for example this edit to Lowell Amos claims he has 4 victims, when he has 1. The policy I linked you to says A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law. Accusations, investigations and arrests do not amount to a conviction. Please do not change any further figures to ones that contradict actual conviction s, thank you. Rising5554 (talk) 13:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Rising5554 (talk) 10:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on David Parker Ray; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TJRC (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---