Jump to content

User talk:188.25.104.45

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Voepass Linhas Aéreas Flight 2283. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 09:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop plagiarizing on Voepass Linhas Aéreas Flight 2283. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 12:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please review this ==> WP:OUROWNWORDS. Don't directly copy and paste from other websites. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 12:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WWGB (talk) 12:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The summary of the Voepass 2283 interim report is highly misleading it redacts out all mentions of warnings that the crew received and gives a complete false image of what happened. 188.25.104.45 (talk) 17:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is beside the point. The fact is you engaged in blatant violations of WP:3RR, which directly led to you being appropriately blocked and will continue to do so in the future unless you learn to interact properly rather than engage in WP:IDNHT. Borgenland (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]