User talk:209.93.129.218

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to CBeebies have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: CBeebies was changed by 209.93.129.218 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950572 on 2021-01-31T12:39:55+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to CBeebies. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 12:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vicky Pryce, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Vicky Pryce was changed by 209.93.129.218 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950125 on 2021-01-31T12:49:17+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

On deciphering your edits, I see that many of them simply pipe wikilinks to the title to which they redirect. Links to redirects are not broken and should not normally be changed. It is often better to link to a redirect than to the article title, for example where the redirect is to a section or might one day have its own article. There are many ways to improve Wikipedia by changing links, such as replacing links to a disambiguation page or to the wrong article by links to the correct article, but please stop editing pages simply to bypass redirects. Thanks, Certes (talk) 11:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

---