Jump to content

User talk:24.226.10.98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
  • Note: the shared nature of this IP is not verified. If anyone has a way of verifying it, please remove this note and add an explanation.

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~.

December 2006

[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Human nature. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kungfu Adam (talk) 00:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Thermopylae. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. 1568 22:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2007

[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Henrik Zetterberg, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Muéro(talk/c) 23:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Wikipedia:Citing sources page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jkelly 21:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Darry2385 23:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Jenny Craig, even if your ultimate intention is to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will 22:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 17:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of North American area codes now a disambiguation page

[edit]

List of North American area codes was moved to List of NANP area codes and turned into a disambiguation page. That editor didn't fix any of those links so there are now a few hundred ambiguous links left pointing at this page. As many of these links were added by you (e.g. here) I thought you might be interested. Unfortunately, instead of being part of a template these links are plain old links, so there's no easy fix. Ewlyahoocom 05:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of The Price Is Right pricing games. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Price Is Right pricing games (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joe Connelly (writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Unitasock (talk) 23:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article LGBT topics and Taoism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article that openly states in the opening sentence that it doesn't make any sense, and proceeds to make up a bunch of stuff on vaguely related topics

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shii (tock) 02:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Johnny Yong Bosch for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny Yong Bosch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Yong Bosch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 06:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fuddle duddle for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fuddle duddle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuddle duddle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave 04:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]