User talk:2402:3A80:6BE:7619:30A9:D81F:1C0B:9AAF

January 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from making further reverts in articles for 2 weeks for casting aspersions instead of properly filing a sockpuppet investigation.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

• Please create a sockpuppet investigation and wait for its result. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@ToBeFree: please unblock so that I can file the SPI. Also, since its a LTA I have additionally informed one of the CU Girth Summit with evidences. 2402:3A80:6BE:7619:30A9:D81F:1C0B:9AAF (talk) 20:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, the block was initially a site-wide one preventing the creation of the SPI. This has changed at 20:36 already. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2402:3A80:6BE:7619:30A9:D81F:1C0B:9AAF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@ToBeFree:please unblock. See User_talk:Girth_Summit#LTAs_sock_is_back._Please_help. Previously I had filled SPI reports for past LTA User:Blogs19. You can check the archives. I am not doing any vandalism or disruption

Decline reason:

No SPI's have been filed from this IP address range. It's entirely possible you filed under a different IP address, of course. Yamla (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm fine with anyone unblocking if Refsceud is blocked. We can probably afford to wait until this has been resolved. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@ToBeFree: I understand but the sock is a abuser and a globally banned editor, the time we wait he will cause a lot of damage. You can check it was taking so long that I had to request them get blocked at meta last time. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Blogs19/Archive#18_January_2022 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Blogs19/Archive#19_January_2022_2 2402:3A80:6BE:7619:68C5:A797:D4DB:9C1F (talk) 20:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@ToBeFree: The master and the socks involve in WP:GAMING. See User_talk:Luckyernie#Gaming_EC? 2402:3A80:6BE:7619:10FE:E46D:FDD2:D267 (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@ToBeFree:I had also stopped vandals. See the recent acknowledgement from CU User:Drmies at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pritam kumar roni das 2402:3A80:6BE:7619:10FE:E46D:FDD2:D267 (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

There is nothing you personally can do to prevent the user from contributing. Instead of relying on specific checkusers to be online, please do file a SPI to fasten the process. There are more than two checkusers on Wikipedia. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Regarding the time it takes for an SPI to be answered: Simple cases with clear diff links and obvious evidence are usually quickly resolved. Complex cases take longer, as it's a volunteer community and the volunteers tend to choose easy tasks. To increase the chance of a quick SPI closure, all you need to do is to present your evidence as clearly as possible. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

---