User talk:2601:404:C67E:10F0:C012:6070:1FB8:725A

June 2022

Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I noticed that in this edit to Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 15:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Chuka Chief_talk 15:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, you may be blocked from editing. Chuka Chief_talk 16:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know where you stand on terrible misinformation. Glad you can manage a site that is not factual in the least and puts in tabloid journalism as sources. But clearly you showed your agenda too, because you are fighting tooth and nail to slander something that doesn't agree with you. 2601:404:C67E:10F0:C012:6070:1FB8:725A (talk) 16:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. Stop the disruptive editing immediately. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 17:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'm putting in factual editing with verifiable sources. Clearly you guy don't want real information and just want to manage a slander Wikipedia site. I guess linking to any site that refutes the blatantly false narrative you are construing will be shot down. How blind, ignorant people get to manage Wikipedia is unfathomable to me. 2601:404:C67E:10F0:C012:6070:1FB8:725A (talk) 17:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:PRIMARY and WP:COPYVIO. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 17:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC); edited 17:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So let me get this straight, a page about a belief organization cannot have their own beliefs posted because it is a "primary source". But an external source can post their wrong misinterpretations of those beliefs and it be fine. How does that make any sense? You guys are an absolute piece of work. And frankly have let the tiny bit of power of managing a site go way to your heads. Props to you for being the reason Wikipedia is still garbage. 2601:404:C67E:10F0:C012:6070:1FB8:725A (talk) 17:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:404:C67E:10F0:C012:6070:1FB8:725A If you would like to insult Wikipedia with ad hominin attacks, instead of trying to refute the point we are trying to make, then Wikipedia is WP:NOT for you. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 17:34, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, anytime I put up information that refutes your slander, you take it down. So, I bet you feel so big and proud of yourself for managing misinformation. And clearly Wikipedia is not for me because I value truth and fact, which clearly you don't because you will do everything in your power to keep a TABLOID NEWS source as "real information". Good to know people would rather live in delusion than actually look at truth impartially. So, once again, great work on peddling garbage! 2601:404:C67E:10F0:C012:6070:1FB8:725A (talk) 17:41, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you dislike the website, as in its community, and its content, and its policies and its guidelines, i.e. everything-Wikipedia, then leave. It's healthy for your mentality! ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 17:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I looked at your profile. No wonder. I see where you stand. 2601:404:C67E:10F0:C012:6070:1FB8:725A (talk) 17:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.