Jump to content

User talk:2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 23:06, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi 2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Get help for adminitis. 2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5 (talk) 00:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He's enforcing an Arbitration decision that explicitly excludes new/unregistered users from editing in the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the talk page... He banned me for using the talk page 2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5 (talk) 01:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Topic area includes talk pages, excepting properly-formatted edit requests. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is unacceptable. Should there be a fee now for editing? This is just using bureaucracy as means of censorship. He gave no reasoning for his actions because there are None. He's simply a vandalising. 2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5 (talk) 01:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In cases where all reasonable attempts to control the spread of disruption arising from long-term disputes have failed, the Committee may be forced to adopt seemingly draconian measures as a last resort for preventing further damage to the encyclopedia.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3) Drawing a distinction between pages "broadly construed" and "reasonably construed" as relating to the Palestine-Israel conflict has been unintuitive and unhelpful, particularly for pages where only a portion of the content is relevant. (Ymblanter's evidence, paragraph 3, and [2])
He gave no reasoning whatsoever. Nor did he give any pointers regarding what to do. He has none. He's simply a vandalising. 2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5 (talk) 01:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He gave you enough reasoning - specifically, the 500/30 rule that the General Sanctions puts on the area. And you're citing a finding of fact, which only explains why the Arbitration Committee is coming to the actually-enforceable remedies that I've now just pointed at twice. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Should disruption occur
That is literally what I did. 2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5 (talk) 01:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not an edit request. Nor is this. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How? The article is poorly written, and it is within the scope of the subject matter. I asked for a reasoning why it was written in such a way. In what way was what I said disruptive? 2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5 (talk) 01:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have you read the link I put above? It should answer your question as to what an edit request is. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 02:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have you? Give a specific answer please. Again, in what way was what I said disruptive? 2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5 (talk) 02:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's patently clear you're not listening to anything I'm saying or reading any links I'm reading except to quote-mine. You have been given clear answers; they just don't match your preferred answers. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 02:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which part of Give a specific answer please. Again, in what way was what I said disruptive? was not understood? 2604:2D80:4D09:1A00:80AD:2C6C:E1A4:2AB5 (talk) 02:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It violates the WP:ECR sanction in place on the Arab/Israel conflict topic area, which is a specific answer as to why your edits were reverted. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which, it should be noted, I explicitly stated above. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]