Jump to content

User talk:49.195.45.202

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please pause at Passion gap[edit]

I cannot understand what you're upset about:

  • My version does not say dentists perform this modification, the word "dental" means "pertaining to the teeth", not "done by a dentist"
  • My version alsodoes not say that people pull their own teeth.
  • You are jamming in verbiage that says that teeth-pulling is illegal, and it's a "mutiliation", and the recipients are "victims". The last two are your personal opinion, and the first is WP:OR because the article takes no stance on who is doing this, because the sources don't say whether it's being done illegally or no.

You can't jam your version through just by persistence. If you keep trying, I'll just file requests to have you IP blocked and the article locked in the last properly cited version (the one I'm supporting). I'm not just trying to be a jerk here, I'm following Wikipedia policy as I have for the last 10 years, and I'm trying to explain it to you and you're trying to force an opinionated version through.

No matter how good you feel your cause is in opposing this practice, Wikipedia is not here to advocate a platform for anyone. MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And why in the world are you capitalizing "Dentists"? It's not a proper noun so doesn't need that. MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:07, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Passion gap, you may be blocked from editing. I've explained the issues on Talk, I've posted on your page, you persist in pushing an opinion about the passion gap rather than follow cited content. You are pushing WP:Original research and trying to Wikipedia:Right great wrongs, neither of which are allowed here. If you persist in disruptive editing, I will ask the Administrators to intervene. MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC) MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have reported your disruptive editing at ANI[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN talk to me 04:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.