User talk:60.241.188.222

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (60.241.188.222) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Crazynas t 08:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to God of War (series), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: God of War (series) was changed by 60.241.188.222 (u) (t) deleting 22492 characters on 2010-07-09T08:06:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page God of War (series). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 08:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to God of War (series). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:16, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing text may be OK[edit]

Hello. I reverted you in relation to God of War series, but I doubt that your edit may be legitimate. When removing a lot of information from articles, in order to avoid being reverted, please fill in the edit summary. Also consider making the changes in several steps instead of one single step where you remove a lot of text. Regards, Anna Lincoln 08:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user seems to be tidying up the article. Anna Lincoln 08:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Legacy of Kain characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Confession0791 (talk) 07:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to List of Legacy of Kain characters. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:43, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 60.241.188.222. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JamesBWatson (talk) 07:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Please, when editing articles, instead of claiming false accusations (e.g. blind reverts), look at what has been edited and put into the edit summaries. Also, instead of removing information, read over it and edit the information. Only remove if it's vandalim, micro-detail, or unsourced (unless it's character and plot sections that can go unsourced or common knowledge) JDC808 (talk) 15:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC) (Diff)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

60.241.188.222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I don't understand the reason for this. From what I can gather, another user is insisting that I'm someone else despite no interest in the same articles. Also using a very large public network and I think it is unfair to just block it outright as others will suffer. Some research shows others have abused the system but that doesn't mean they are all the same person. I'm happy to get a user name if that will help, but surely this vendetta that one person has against another shouldn't be allowed to poison the process? Happy to sit out block if need be but I still think it is very unfair as it is based on an assumption. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Then sit it out. For someone who has called on others in edit summaries to discuss things more than once, you're remarkably resistant to the idea of discussing some rather major edits despite multiple templated warnings. Responding to any one of them and ... discussing your edits would likely have averted this outcome. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually, many of those "warnings" are just automated, or someone not familiar with the information. My edits have also incorporated many of other's contributions, usually with some rewriting (that was also very blunt. Surely things can be put in a more diplomatic way?). 60.241.188.222 (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Abhijay What did I do this time? 03:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asgardian, you are community banned, which means you are not welcome here anymore. Find another website to plague and grow up. Assuming new identities will not work. Abhijay What did I do this time? 03:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:60.241.188.222&oldid=481624175"