User talk:66.0.125.22
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your IP address, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Welcome!
[edit]
|
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks. |
---|
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
January 2018[edit]Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this: Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes) Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Edit summary content is visible in: Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - theWOLFchild 01:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
February 2018[edit]Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - theWOLFchild 20:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi, I see you added new columns to the table and filled in the rows for the first 20 entries. I hope you intend to complete the rows for the other ≈120 entries... - wolf 18:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Another 20 down, only 100 more to go. Btw, where are you sourcing the dates from? And, will you be adding refs? Otherwise, your edits might be challenged and all your work removed. - wolf 23:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Another 30 down. It's getting there. You are getting these messages, right? I'd still like to know about the sourcing, but also have some questions about laid keels, (if you know, which gets back to sources). Thanks - wolf 05:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- You finished. Good for you. (No reply. No sources. Hope it works out.) - wolf 15:13, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- The sources for this information on Laid down, Launched and Commissioned are the individual Wikipedia pages for the various ships or the class pages for each class. Not quite sure how to source these. Wanted to add this information to get an idea of how quickly some of these massive ships went from laid down to commissioned. Shortest was 101 days! 66.0.125.22 (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply (I wasn't sure you were even checking this page) I had suspected as much about the source of info, just wasn't going to go through all 140 pages to check. Copying within Wikipedia is ok, but at minimum you should provide a link to the source article in an edit summary for attribution. (This is also why I added the edit summary notice to this page earlier to encourage you to start adding them as you had'nt added any.) In this case, you were adding info from 20 to 40 pages at one go, so linking them all in a summary would have been impractical, if not impossible. Instead, I would've suggested you put a note on the article talk page that the info is from each individual ship article, then just mention that in your summary. It's too late for edit summaries now, but you can still note the attribution on the talk page. That way you don't need to worry about the info you added being challenged as unsourced. - wolf 17:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- I just learned how to reply, after some trial and error. So the note here is sufficient or do I need to add something on the article itself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.0.125.22 (talk) 17:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Nah, I took care of that already. Cheers - wolf 06:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- I just learned how to reply, after some trial and error. So the note here is sufficient or do I need to add something on the article itself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.0.125.22 (talk) 17:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply (I wasn't sure you were even checking this page) I had suspected as much about the source of info, just wasn't going to go through all 140 pages to check. Copying within Wikipedia is ok, but at minimum you should provide a link to the source article in an edit summary for attribution. (This is also why I added the edit summary notice to this page earlier to encourage you to start adding them as you had'nt added any.) In this case, you were adding info from 20 to 40 pages at one go, so linking them all in a summary would have been impractical, if not impossible. Instead, I would've suggested you put a note on the article talk page that the info is from each individual ship article, then just mention that in your summary. It's too late for edit summaries now, but you can still note the attribution on the talk page. That way you don't need to worry about the info you added being challenged as unsourced. - wolf 17:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- The sources for this information on Laid down, Launched and Commissioned are the individual Wikipedia pages for the various ships or the class pages for each class. Not quite sure how to source these. Wanted to add this information to get an idea of how quickly some of these massive ships went from laid down to commissioned. Shortest was 101 days! 66.0.125.22 (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
[edit]Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Gerardo Martino, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |