Jump to content

User talk:71.124.44.45

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Contact high has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 21:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Contact high, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Contact high was changed by 71.124.44.45 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-03-27T17:37:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Contact high, you will be blocked from editing. You can call me Salvio (talk) 17:51, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Contact high. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You can call me Salvio (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to comment on an article, use its talk page or edit it, but don't just vandalise it. You can call me Salvio (talk)

You are violating the three-revert rule on Contact high.[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Contact high. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. - Zhang He (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Calmer Waters 18:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.124.44.45 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

All I'm trying to do is stop mis-information on Wiki! But, if you are so fucking high and mighty, I'll let it go. Wikipedia can be a great source of info, (Personal attack removed) ruin it! Have fun with your shitty assed dictatorship that is Wikipedia!

Decline reason:

As pointed out below, personal attacks aren't helping your case. —DoRD (talk) 18:59, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Attacking other people won't get you anywhere. - Zhang He (talk) 18:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]